Back

Automated morphometry and weight prediction of juvenile Chinook Salmon leveraging open-source deep learning models

Knight, B.; Jeffres, C.

2026-03-12 ecology
10.64898/2026.03.10.710725 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Minimizing handling of threatened and endangered fish has become increasingly important as populations have dwindled. To minimize handling in morphometric measurements, the HandsFreeFishing program has been developed for juvenile Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). By segmenting a 2D image many morphometric measurements are able to be estimated; from these measurements a weight prediction model is built based on fish whose ground truthed weights were measured using a digital scale. While many segmentation methods may be used, here Metas Segment Anything model (SAM) is employed to produce segmentation masks of raw images. This model is open-source and easily used on any image (of any size) with good performance. In the proposed framework, the user supplies a bounding box around a target fish along with minimal orientation data (left or right facing, upside down or right-side up); the rest of the segmentation, feature extraction, and final weight prediction is completely automated. A main goal of the segmentation is to estimate the surface area of the side profile of the fish. Then, assuming an ellipsoidal shape, this surface area can be related to the volume of the fish, which is directly proportional to the weight. Even on a relatively small dataset of 149 images (fork length 27-90mm) our results confirm the predictive qualities of the morphometric features measured. The model achieved weight prediction with a mean absolute error of 0.16 g with a mean absolute percentage error of 12%, and an r-squared value of 0.99, on fish ranging from 0.31g - 7.74g. The raw images come from a variety of fish viewers, the design of which is relatively inexpensive and reproducible, and, in conjunction with the HandsFreeFishing program, allows for minimal handling compared to traditional length and weight measurement methods.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 4%
26.6%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 2%
15.1%
3
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.7%
50% of probability mass above
4
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
5
Animals
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
6
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.2%
8
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.7%
9
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
10
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
11
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
12
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
13
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
14
Applied Sciences
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
15
Limnology and Oceanography: Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
16
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.8%
17
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
18
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
19
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
20
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
21
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
22
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
24
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 48%
0.5%
25
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%