Back

CRISPR screens establish regulatory maps of immunosuppressive surface molecules in cancer

Kalis, R.; Deswal, S.; Schaefer, M.; Kalxdorf, M.; Jude, J.; Lipp, J.; Rieser, S.; Vogt, V.; de Almeida, M.; Fellner, M.; Ruhland, S.; Frasz, L.; Andersch, F.; Krijgsveld, J.; Carotta, S.; Zuber, J.

2026-03-11 molecular biology
10.64898/2026.03.10.710555 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cancer cells can evade immune surveillance by triggering inhibitory checkpoint responses in tumor-associated T cells through the expression of immunosuppressive surface molecules. While therapeutic blockade of such receptors has emerged as a pillar of cancer therapy, tumor cell-intrinsic mechanisms controlling their expression remain incompletely understood. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS)-based genetic screens can be used to decipher regulatory pathways, but conventional screening approaches are biased towards regulators that are dispensable for cancer cell proliferation and survival. Here, we used a tetracycline-inducible Cas9 system enabling fully time-controllable CRISPR-based mutagenesis to gain a more comprehensive and comparative survey of regulators controlling the expression of four major immunosuppressive surface molecules, PD-L1 (CD274), CD47, CD276 and HLA-E, as well as CD151, a candidate surface target associated with tumor growth and invasion. As a prominent hit, our screens identify the membrane-trafficking factor DNAJC13 as a regulator of PD-L1 and CD276. Among DNAJC13-controlled surface proteins, we identify other known and proposed immune-checkpoint molecules. Based on this function, suppression of DNAJC13 strongly increases the sensitivity of human cancer cells to T-cell attack in vitro and prolongs survival of mice bearing pancreatic tumors. Together, our study establishes regulatory maps of major immune-modulatory surface molecules and identifies DNAJC13 as a potential target for the coordinated inhibition of multiple immunosuppressive signals.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.