Back

Dry Needling in Parkinson' s Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial with Markerless Kinematic Analysis

Tahara, A.; Chinaglia, A.; Luiz Martins Monteiro Rafael, R.; Santos, L.; Santiago, P. R.

2026-03-11 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.64898/2026.03.10.26348054 medRxiv
Show abstract

Parkinsons disease (PD) is associated with debilitating motor symptoms, including gait impairments and stooped posture. While markerless motion capture offers a scalable alternative to quantify these deficits, the acute biomechanical effects of interventions like Dry Needling (DN) on PD gait remain under-investigated. This randomized clinical trial investigated the acute effects of upper trapezius myofascial release via DN on gait and turning biomechanics in individuals with PD, utilizing a 3D markerless motion capture system. Thirty-eight participants with mild-to-moderate PD and bilateral upper trapezius trigger points were randomly assigned to a DN or Sham group. Gait was evaluated during a modified Timed Up and Go (TUG) test at baseline, immediately post-intervention, and at a one-week follow-up. Video data were processed using the open-source vaila toolbox, which applied a rigorous spatial segmentation algorithm to isolate postural transitions, steady-state gait, and turning phases. Thirty-seven participants completed the protocol (DN = 18; Sham = 19). The algorithm-driven markerless pipeline successfully extracted high-fidelity spatiotemporal parameters and automated gait event detection. However, the quantitative analysis revealed no significant Group x Time interactions for spatiotemporal parameters or turning kinematics, with both groups exhibiting similar trajectories across all assessment points. In conclusion, a single session of upper trapezius DN does not yield superior acute improvements in gait or turning biomechanics compared to a sham intervention in PD, suggesting that macro-level motor adaptations likely require cumulative therapeutic sessions. Nevertheless, the successful implementation of this markerless workflow provides an objective, cost-effective framework for precisely tracking phase-specific kinematic changes in routine clinical settings.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.