Recovery Trajectories in Post-stroke Ataxia: Modeling a Bayesian Nonlinear Mixed-effects Model
Yamasaki, Y.; Takamura, Y.; Sato, H.; Okuma, K.; Kobayashi, Y.; Kamijima, A.; Takaishi, S.; Maruki, H.; Morioka, S.
Show abstract
PurposeThe prognosis of post-stroke ataxia remains controversial. It is unclear whether the proportional recovery rule (PRR) established for hemiparesis applies to ataxia, given that cerebellar plasticity suggests trajectories may not depend solely on initial severity. This study was conducted to quantitatively decompose longitudinal ataxia recovery trajectories into proportional recovery coefficient (r) and time constant ({tau}) using a Bayesian nonlinear mixed-effects model, and elucidate their independent determinants and associations with functional walking independence. MethodsWe analyzed longitudinal SARA scores of 80 subacute patients with stroke to estimate individual initial severity (), r, and {tau}. Recovery patterns were clustered based on these parameters. We analyzed the attainment of independent walking using the Kaplan-Meier method and identified predictors via hierarchical multiple regression analysis. ResultsThree distinct clusters were identified. The moderate group (younger, preserved attention) achieved rapid improvement and early walking independence. In contrast, the severe group showed a significantly prolonged time constant ({tau}) but maintained a high proportional recovery coefficient (r), ultimately achieving walking independence in over 90% of cases. Regression analysis revealed a dissociation: biological age constrained the recovery ceiling (r), while attentional function independently regulated recovery speed ({tau}). ConclusionsRecovery from post-stroke ataxia bifurcates into rapid neurological restoration and a delayed process driven by compensatory learning. Especially in severe cases, long-term learning using attentional resources is crucial. These findings challenge prognosis prediction based solely on initial severity, supporting stratified rehabilitation strategies tailored to individual recovery ceilings and learning speeds.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Continuous theta-burst stimulation of the contralesional primary motor cortex for promotion of upper limb recovery after stroke: a randomized controlled trial 94%
- Longitudinal trajectories of global and domain-specific cognition after stroke using the Oxford Cognitive Screen 93%
- Trial of high-intensity gait training and step monitoring for stroke 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Preliminary outcomes of combined treadmill and overground high-intensity interval training in ambulatory chronic stroke 94%
- Sensorimotor upper limb therapy does not improve somatosensory function and may negatively interfere with motor recovery: a randomized controlled trial in the early rehabilitation phase after stroke 92%
- Towards individualized Medicine in Stroke – the TiMeS project: protocol of longitudinal, multi-modal, multi-domain study in stroke 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Early functional connectivity alterations in contralesional motor networks influence outcome after severe stroke 92%
- Multifactorial motor behavior assessment for real-time evaluation of emerging therapeutics to treat neurologic impairments 92%
- Gait signature changes with walking speed are similar among able-bodied young adults despite persistent individual-specific differences 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.