Back

Development and validation of the Food Expectation Questionnaire (FEX-Q) to assess food-related perceptions and symptom expectations

Katsumata, R.; Trindade, I.; Storsrud, S.; Simren, M.; Nybacka, S.

2026-03-11 gastroenterology
10.64898/2026.03.10.26348014 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundFood-related gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms are highly prevalent in patients with IBS. Although dietary components may trigger symptoms through luminal mechanisms, cognitive expectations may also shape symptom perception within the gut-brain axis. No validated instrument currently exists to measure food-related symptom expectations. Hence, we developed and validated the Food Expectation Questionnaire (FEX-Q). MethodsThe FEX-Q was developed using a stepwise process including focus group interviews and face-to-face validation to ensure content validity. The finalized digital questionnaire presents 44 food images with six items rated on a visual analogue scale (VAS; 0-100), including the core item assessing food-related symptom expectation ("How severe GI symptoms do you expect after eating this food?"). Additional domains assess taste preference, willingness to eat, perceived healthiness, and perceived fat and carbohydrate content. The finalized FEX-Q was administered in a nationwide online validation survey of adults with IBS and non-IBS controls in Sweden. Participants also completed validated questionnaires including GI symptom severity (combined GSRS), psychological distress (HADS), food-related quality of life (FR-QOL), and a screening tool for food avoidance (NIAS). ResultsTwenty adults with IBS and non-IBS controls participated in the face-to-face validation, resulting in a final version of the FEX-Q comprising 44 food images, which were properly identified and provided a range of macronutrient distributions and trigger foods. In the nationwide online study including 134 patients with IBS and 126 non-IBS controls, the FEX-Q demonstrated strong known-groups validity (mean symptom expectation 18.4 in controls vs 50.1 in IBS), strong construct validity (perceived vs actual fat content r=0.78, p<0.001 and carbohydrate content r=0.59, p<0.001), significant convergent validity with GI symptom severity and food-related quality of life, and high internal consistency (split-half reliability Spearman-Brown corrected r=0.88). ConclusionThe FEX-Q can capture individual food-related symptom expectations to distinct food images. This reliable measurement can be useful to reveal the mechanism of food-related symptom expectations and provide clinically relevant insights for personalized dietary management

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
2
American Journal of Gastroenterology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
3
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
4
Appetite
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
5
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
6
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Neurogastroenterology & Motility
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 36%
4.0%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.3%
10
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
11
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
12
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
13
The Journal of Pain
26 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
16
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
17
Gut Microbes
70 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
18
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
19
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Nutrition
23 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
24
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.7%
25
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
27
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.6%