Back

XMR: A cross-population Mendelian randomization method for causal inference using genome-wide summary statistics

Huang, X.; Chao, Z.; Wang, Z.; Hu, X.; Yang, C.

2026-03-10 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.03.10.26348003 medRxiv
Show abstract

Mendelian randomization (MR) is an important tool for inferring causal relationships between exposures (like lifestyle factors or biomarkers) and health outcomes using genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary data, yet the small sample sizes of non-European populations often result in insufficient instrumental variables (IVs) and unreliable causal effect estimates. In this paper, we consider causal inference in underrepresented populations to improve global health equity. We propose a statistical method for cross-population MR, XMR, to enhance causal inference in these target populations by using auxiliary GWAS summary statistics from global biobanks. By leveraging the shared genetic basis of exposure traits in the target and auxiliary populations, XMR increases the number of IVs while maintaining robust estimates via rigorous evaluation of IV validity and accounting for confounding factors. Through extensive simulations and real-data analyses, we demonstrate that XMR can achieve greater statistical power, better control of false positive rates and more replicable results compared to existing methods. Notably, XMR successfully identifies novel causal relationships in our studies of the East Asian (including Japanese and Taiwanese), Central/South Asian, and African populations. These findings reveal potential heterogeneity in causal patterns across populations, highlighting the importance of causal inference in underrepresented populations.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
18.4%
2
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.3%
3
Genetic Epidemiology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.3%
5
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.2%
6
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.9%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.0%
9
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.0%
10
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.0%
11
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
12
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.3%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.1%
14
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
15
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
70 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
16
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 45%
1.5%
19
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
20
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
21
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.9%
22
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
23
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.7%
24
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
25
Environmental Health Perspectives
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%