XMR: A cross-population Mendelian randomization method for causal inference using genome-wide summary statistics
Huang, X.; Chao, Z.; Wang, Z.; Hu, X.; Yang, C.
Show abstract
Mendelian randomization (MR) is an important tool for inferring causal relationships between exposures (like lifestyle factors or biomarkers) and health outcomes using genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary data, yet the small sample sizes of non-European populations often result in insufficient instrumental variables (IVs) and unreliable causal effect estimates. In this paper, we consider causal inference in underrepresented populations to improve global health equity. We propose a statistical method for cross-population MR, XMR, to enhance causal inference in these target populations by using auxiliary GWAS summary statistics from global biobanks. By leveraging the shared genetic basis of exposure traits in the target and auxiliary populations, XMR increases the number of IVs while maintaining robust estimates via rigorous evaluation of IV validity and accounting for confounding factors. Through extensive simulations and real-data analyses, we demonstrate that XMR can achieve greater statistical power, better control of false positive rates and more replicable results compared to existing methods. Notably, XMR successfully identifies novel causal relationships in our studies of the East Asian (including Japanese and Taiwanese), Central/South Asian, and African populations. These findings reveal potential heterogeneity in causal patterns across populations, highlighting the importance of causal inference in underrepresented populations.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Welch-weighted Egger regression reduces false positives due to correlated pleiotropy in Mendelian randomization 96%
- Evaluating Multi-Ancestry Genome-Wide Association Methods: Statistical Power, Population Structure, and Practical Implications 96%
- CADET: Enhanced transcriptome-wide association analyses in admixed samples using eQTL summary data 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- XMAP: Cross-population fine-mapping by leveraging genetic diversity and accounting for confounding bias 97%
- Testing and controlling for horizontal pleiotropy with the probabilistic Mendelian randomization in transcriptome-wide association studies 97%
- Multi-context genetic modeling of transcriptional regulation resolves novel disease loci 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Fast and flexible joint fine-mapping of multiple traits via the Sum of Single Effects model 96%
- Mendelian randomization accounting for correlated and uncorrelated pleiotropic effects using genome-wide summary statistics. 96%
- A new method for multi-ancestry polygenic prediction improves performance across diverse populations 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.