Back

Impact of music on running fatigue: Distraction effect from lyrics could further delay running fatigue compared to synchronous effect from tempo

Dreher, M.; Terterov, A.; Feistner, O.; Freiermuth, L.; Schaps, P.; Yeager, H.; Zhang-Lea, J. H.

2026-03-13 biophysics
10.64898/2026.03.09.710701 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Motivational music has been shown to improve running performance through delaying fatigue and increasing run duration. Previous studies have highlighted the effect of music tempo, that matching tempo to the runners cadence delays running fatigue. It remains unclear whether the motivational content in music lyrics is also responsible for delaying running fatigue. We designed a cross-sectional study and investigated the effect of tempo and motivational content on running biomechanics, and had participants run at a moderate intensity for up to ten minutes, or until exhaustion. Fifteen adults (age=20.9{+/-}1.3 years, weight=71.2{+/-}12.1 kg, height=174.7{+/-}11.0 cm) participated. Participants finished three trials, starting with running without any stimulus as a baseline trial, and ran with a visual metronome that flashed at a rate that matched their running cadence in the visual stimulus trial (VST). In the visual-auditory stimulus trial (VAST), participants ran with the visual metronome (as described in VST) while listening to a non-rhythmic motivational speech. We recorded run duration, perceived exertion, center of pressure sway during standing before and after each trial, and measured trunk acceleration to obtain root-mean-square (RMS) of acceleration during each minute of the run. Compared to baseline, participants reduced perceived exertion by 0.87 and 0.85 rating during the VST and VAST, respectively, though these changes did not reach significance (p=0.05). Stimulus affected the RMS of acceleration in anterior-posterior (p=0.011), vertical (p=0.008), and resultant directions (p=0.006). Our linear mixed effect model suggested that compared VST, VAST further lowered RMS of acceleration by 0.026g (anterior-posterior), 0.028g (vertical), and 0.036g (resultant). Our results showed that motivational content played an important role in lowering RMS of trunk acceleration, with the potential to delay running-induced fatigue. To maximize the effect of music on running performance, runners should listen to music that they find motivational and that is close to their natural running cadence.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 2%
33.9%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.4%
3
Experimental Physiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
4
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.8%
5
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
6
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
7
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
8
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
9
European Journal of Applied Physiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
10
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
11
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
13
Journal of Visualized Experiments
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
14
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
15
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
16
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.0%
18
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.8%
23
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.7%
24
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
25
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
26
Gait & Posture
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
27
Life
27 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%