Back

The Tangled History and Taxonomy of an Iconic Chorus Frog Complex Clarified using Genomic Analyses

McDaniels, C. X.; Povelikin, N.; Dye, M.; Kortyna, M. L.; Jadin, R. C.; Orlofske, S. A.; Parra-Olea, G.; Lemmon, A. R.; Lemmon, E. R.; Barrow, L. N.

2026-03-12 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.03.09.710633 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWSpecies represent a fundamental unit of biodiversity in evolutionary biology, but the nature of the speciation continuum and inadequate sampling of organisms with broad distributions provide substantial challenges to species delimitation. The Pacific Treefrog complex (Pseudacris regilla sensu lato) is an iconic but systematically poorly understood group of chorus frogs inhabiting a vast portion of western North America. Current studies tentatively recognize three species in this complex (P. hypochondriaca, P. regilla, P. sierra), but disagreement remains among morphological, mitochondrial, and nuclear genetic data. In this study, we used thorough geographic sampling and thousands of nuclear loci to clarify the phylogenetic relationships and divergence history of P. regilla s.l. lineages and recommend a new taxonomic arrangement. We inferred recent divergence with gene flow between P. regilla and P. sierra, topological inconsistencies, and genealogical divergence indices that place P. regilla and P. sierra firmly in the "gray zone" of speciation. Pseudacris hypochondriaca diverged over 0.5 Ma without gene flow until recent secondary contact with the "north" (P. regilla + P. sierra) lineage. Based on inferences from our genomic data and recently published acoustic signal differentiation, we propose a two species taxonomy for this complex, recognizing the "north" lineage as P. regilla. Our study shows how extensive geographic sampling, high-throughput sequencing, and multiple analytical approaches can resolve systematic uncertainties in challenging species complexes.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
61 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.2%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.1%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 11%
6.8%
4
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.8%
5
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.3%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 19%
6.3%
7
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
8
Systematic Biology
121 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
9
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
10
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
11
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
12
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 35%
1.5%
14
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.5%
15
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
Journal of Biogeography
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
17
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
19
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
20
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
21
Conservation Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
22
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
23
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
24
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
25
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
26
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
28
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.8%
29
Journal of Heredity
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
30
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.7%