Back

Mechanical Work Performance Constraints and Timing Govern Human Walking: A Modified Inverted Pendulum Model for Single Support

Hosseini-Yazdi, S.-S.; Bertram, J. E.

2026-03-11 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.03.09.710603 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Human walking is often considered an inverted pendulum during single support, suggesting conservative dynamics. Gait consists of discrete steps connected by mechanically costly transitions. We examine how step length, walking speed, and work capacity jointly constrain walking mechanics. Using a powered simple walking model, minimum speed required to complete a step of given length is derived based on gravitational work; below this threshold, forward progression becomes mechanically infeasible, and the next heel-strike occurs early, producing shorter steps. Comparisons with empirical step length-speed relationships show that humans walk at higher speeds and require greater push-off work, indicating energy dissipation. We extend pendular dynamics by incorporating hip torque, a linearized axial force model, and muscle intervention. This framework reproduces key GRF features, including the M-shaped profile, without prescribing force trajectories a priori. Fitted parameters suggest reduced average loading (CBaseline < 1), active mid-stance unloading (Am < 0), and narrowly timed muscle action (small{sigma} m). Parameter studies show that increasing step length or speed increases transition work and peak forces, while hip torque timing indicates mechanical cost is minimized when energy modulation occurs after mid-stance. These findings indicate that preferred walking speed emerges from feasibility and work-capacity constraints, not energetic optimality alone.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.5%
2
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 4%
12.4%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 3%
10.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.4%
5
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.1%
7
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
8
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
9
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
10
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
11
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
12
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.5%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.2%
15
Biological Cybernetics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
16
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.1%
17
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
18
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
19
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
20
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
21
Bioinspiration & Biomimetics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
22
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
24
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.5%