Back

Dual plasmepsin IX and X inhibitors are refractory to development of resistance

Favuzza, P.; Dans, M.; Su, W.; Thompson, J. K.; Hodder, A. N.; Ngo, A.; Penington, J.; Marapana, D.; Papenfuss, T.; de Lera Ruiz, M.; Coyle, R.; Lee, M.; McCauley, J.; Lowes, K.; Olsen, D.; Sleebs, B.; Cowman, A.

2026-03-10 microbiology
10.64898/2026.03.09.710546 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) remain the cornerstone of malaria treatment, but emerging resistance threatens their efficacy. The potential for the development of drug resistance against plasmepsin X (PMX)-selective inhibitors and dual plasmepsin IX/X (PMIX/X) inhibitors was investigated in Plasmodium falciparum. A series of PMX-selective (WM4, WM76, WM92) and PMIX/X dual inhibitors (WM382, WM09, WM42) were characterised for potency against parasite growth and enzyme inhibition. In vitro selection experiments showed that all compounds had a high barrier to resistance, although parasites with reduced sensitivity to PMX-selective inhibitors could still be selected. Resistance mechanisms involved pmx gene amplification and point mutations (D245N, S315P, S359P, I363L) that alter inhibitor binding. Recombinant expression and Michaelis-Menten kinetics demonstrated that these mutations impair drug binding whilst preserving PMX catalytic function. Reverse genetics confirmed that introducing these mutations into the pmx gene resulted in decreased potency of the inhibitors. In this study, resistance to the PMIX/X dual inhibitors evaluated here could not be selected, despite prolonged selection pressure. Antimalarial Resistome Barcoding (AReBar) assays confirmed the absence of pre-existing resistance to either inhibitor class. Critically, PMIX/X dual inhibitors maintained efficacy against parasites with decreased sensitivity to PMX-selective compounds. These findings demonstrate that dual PMIX/X inhibitors present a substantially higher barrier to resistance than PMX-selective inhibitors, informing antimalarial drug development strategies and highlighting dual-target inhibition as a promising approach to mitigate resistance risks.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Malaria Journal
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
24.0%
2
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
24.0%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 16%
10.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.1%
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 23%
3.8%
6
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.8%
7
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.2%
8
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
9
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
10
ACS Infectious Diseases
74 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
11
Cell Chemical Biology
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
12
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
13
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
14
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
15
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.0%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.8%
17
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
18
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
19
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.8%
20
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.7%
21
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%
22
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
23
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%