Back

In-house produced MarathonRT comparison to uMRT and Induro in tRNA sequencing library preparation

Pedor, J. K.; Gregorova, P.; Radesic, M.; Sarin, P.

2026-03-09 molecular biology
10.64898/2026.03.09.710538 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Over the past decade, groundbreaking discoveries have cemented transfer RNAs (tRNAs) as versatile regulators of translation and cellular function. As tRNA research gains momentum, several high-throughput sequencing methods for quantitative analysis of tRNA isoacceptors in cells have emerged. However, the strong secondary structure and rich post-transcriptional modification of most tRNA molecules pose significant challenges for reverse transcriptases, thus hampering library preparation and introducing quantification biases. Current approaches rely on processive next generation reverse transcriptases (ngRTs), such as Induro (NEB) and uMRT (RNAConnect), to overcome these problems. Nevertheless, using these commercial enzymes comes with a relatively high cost per reaction. Here, we introduce a redesigned MarathonRT construct with added C-terminal chitin binding domain (CBD) and present a simple and robust one-step purification protocol for the in-house production of the redesigned and the original MarathonRT construct. Next, we set up an affordable colorimetry-based method for determining the specific activity of the enzyme. Our simplified method eliminates protein precipitation and yields over 26,000 enzymatic reactions per 0.5 L culture. Importantly, the in-house produced enzymes showed equal performance to established ngRTs Induro and uMRT in tRNA-seq workflow. In addition, we benchmark the use of rapid tRNA spin column-based extraction method to traditional gel-extraction using tRNA-seq and LC-MS. This improved workflow reduces the time and cost of tRNA-seq library preparation while providing an accessible MarathonRT purification protocol.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
23.4%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 16%
10.5%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.1%
4
RNA Biology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
5
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
6
ACS Central Science
66 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
8
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.8%
9
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.9%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.9%
11
ACS Chemical Biology
150 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
12
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
13
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.9%
15
Biochemistry
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
16
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
17
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
19
Cell Discovery
54 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
Journal of Structural Biology
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.8%
22
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
81 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
23
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
38 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
24
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
25
NAR Molecular Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
26
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
27
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Cell Chemical Biology
81 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
29
Cell Reports Physical Science
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
Protein & Cell
25 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%