Back

Cell line identity rather than medium composition determines transcriptomic profiles of HepaRG and HuH7 cells cultured in chemically defined or serum-based media: comparison with primary human hepatocytes

Ali, A. S. M.; Sprenger, H.; Braeuning, A.; Kurreck, J.

2026-03-11 cell biology
10.64898/2026.03.09.710463 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The composition of culture medium is a major, yet frequently undercontrolled, determinant of hepatic cell state in vitro. For decades, fetal bovine serum (FBS) has been routinely incorporated into liver cell culture. Its undefined and lot-to-lot variable composition can, however, confound cell identity and experimental reproducibility. Serum-free, chemically defined media (CDM) represent an alternative approach that can improve standardization, but the consequences of transitioning from FBS-supplemented media (FBS-SM) to CDM remain insufficiently characterized in hepatic models, particularly with respect to metabolic and detoxification programs that govern xenobiotic handling and hepatotoxicity readouts. Here, we systematically assessed how replacing FBS-SM with CDM remodels transcriptomic profiles in two widely used human hepatic cell lines (HepaRG and HuH7 cells) and compared the results to that obtained from primary human hepatocytes (PHH). Global transcriptomic analyses indicated that cell type was the primary driver of variance, whereas medium induced a model-dependent secondary effect. Functional interpretation showed preferential enhancement of xenobiotic metabolism and transport-associated programs in HepaRG cells, while HuH7 cells response was dominated by lipid/sterol homeostasis and stress-linked processes. Benchmarking against PHH based on hepatic identity and detoxification gene panels further supported improved PHH alignment for HepaRG cells under CDM compared to cultures with FBS-SM, with limited improvement for HuH7 cells. Collectively, these findings address a key knowledge gap by defining how FBS-SM and CDM impact the transcriptomic profiles of HepaRG and HuH7 cells.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Toxicological Sciences
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.9%
2
Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.6%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.1%
5
Journal of Lipid Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
6
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
7
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
8
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.8%
9
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.0%
10
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
50% of probability mass above
11
Food Research International
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
12
Environmental Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
13
RSC Advances
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
14
Chemical Engineering Journal
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
15
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.0%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 52%
0.9%
18
The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
19
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
20
Food Chemistry
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
21
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
22
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.8%
23
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
Stem Cell Research & Therapy
30 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Chemistry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
26
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
27
Archives of Toxicology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
28
BMC Biotechnology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
29
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%