Back

Peer Support in Online Discussions of Male Infertility: A Natural Language Processing Study of Reddit

Khatun, M.; Patel, N.; Loid, M.; Destouni, A.; Lingasamy, P.; S, S. L.; Peters, M.; Sharma, R.; Salumets, A.; Modhukur, V.

2026-03-10 sexual and reproductive health
10.64898/2026.03.09.26347980 medRxiv
Show abstract

Infertility generates profound psychological and social distress for both women and men, yet mens communicative experiences remain comparatively underexamined. Male infertility (MI) is often shaped by stigma, norms of masculinity, and limited opportunities for emotional disclosure, constraining help-seeking in offline settings. This study investigates how men use anonymous online peer-support spaces to discuss MI by analyzing discussions from the r/maleinfertility subreddit on Reddit. Using natural language processing techniques, we examined 10,769 posts and 80,381 comments published between 2013 and 2025. Analyses assessed sentiment and emotional expression, topic structure, hyperlink networks, and discussions related to diagnostic testing, treatment decision-making, and donor sperm use. Topic modeling revealed a functional differentiation between posts and comments. Original posts primarily focused on clinical sense-making, including interpretation of semen analyses, hormonal testing, and assisted reproduction options. In contrast, comments emphasized emotional validation, experiential knowledge-sharing, and normalization of alternative family-building pathways. Emotional expression varied by discussion topic, with heightened fear and sadness in conversations involving genetic testing, surgical sperm retrieval, and donor sperm. Hyperlink analysis indicated frequent engagement with peer-reviewed medical information, reflecting active evidence-seeking alongside peer exchange. Taken together, findings suggest that anonymous online communities function as critical infrastructures of support for men experiencing infertility, enabling forms of disclosure and vulnerability often constrained in offline contexts. These spaces facilitate interpretation of medical information, collective coping, and decision-making regarding treatment and donor options. The study highlights the role of digital anonymity in mitigating stigma and expanding communicative possibilities for men navigating infertility alongside clinical care.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.8%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 3%
12.6%
3
Human Reproduction
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.3%
5
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.5%
6
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.5%
8
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
9
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
10
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
11
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
70 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 41%
1.7%
13
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
15
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.9%
16
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.9%
17
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.9%
18
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
19
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.7%
20
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
21
EMBO Reports
88 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
22
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Journal of Pathology Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
24
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%