Back

Associations between spatial distribution of immune cell subsets and clinical outcomes in patients with advanced melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: results from the PUMA challenge

Schuiveling, M.; Liu, H.; Eek, D.; Hanusov, M.; van Duin, I.; ter Maat, L. S.; van der Weerd, J. C.; van den Berkmortel, F. W. P. J.; Blank, C. U.; Breimer, G. E.; Burgers, F. H.; Boers-Sonderen, M.; van den Eertwegh, A. J. M.; de Groot, J. W.; Haanen, J. B. A. G.; Hospers, G. A. P.; Kapiteijn, E.; Piersma, D.; Simkens, L. H. J.; Westgeest, H. M.; Schrader, A. M. R.; van Diest, P. J.; Lv, J.; Zhu, Y.; Tenorio, C. G. C.; Chohan, B. S.; Eastwood, M.; Raza, S. E. A.; Torbati, N.; Meshcheryakova, A.; Mechtcheriakova, D.; Mahbod, A.; Adams, D.; Galdran, A.; Pluim, J. P. W.; Blokx, W. A. M.; Suijker

2026-03-10 oncology
10.64898/2026.03.09.26347935 medRxiv
Show abstract

Patients with advanced melanoma are treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), yet less than 50% of patients achieve a durable response while all patients are exposed to the risk of severe side effects. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in pathology images are associated with ICI outcomes, but manual assessment is subjective. In addition, the predictive value of other immune cell subsets, including plasma cells, neutrophils, histiocytes, and melanophages, remains unclear. We organized the Panoptic segmentation of nUclei and tissue in advanced MelanomA (PUMA) challenge to evaluate whether the spatial localization of TILs and other immune cell subsets on melanoma H&E slides collected before start of treatment was associated with treatment outcomes. Algorithm performance was evaluated on a hidden test set, after which top-ranked algorithms were applied to pre-treatment metastatic whole-slide images from a large, multicenter cohort of patients with advanced melanoma treated with first-line ICIs (n=1102). Automatically quantified tissue features and immune cell subsets were then associated with clinical outcomes. Top-performing algorithms improved detection of immune cell subsets, although accuracy for rare classes remained limited. Across challenge participants, TIL density showed the most consistent association with treatment response and survival. Associations for stromal TILs were weaker, while plasma cells, histiocytes, melanophages, neutrophils, necrosis and blood vessels did not show independent associations with outcomes. Overall, the results from the PUMA challenge improved the state of the art of immune cell detection in melanoma histopathology and show that intra-tumoral lymphocytes are the immune cell subset most consistently associated with treatment response and survival. HighlightsO_LIWe organized the first melanoma-specific tissue and nuclei segmentation competition C_LIO_LIWinning algorithms were applied to 1102 whole-slide images for biomarker analysis C_LIO_LIIntra-tumoral TILs were associated with response to immune checkpoint inhibitors C_LIO_LIOther immune cell subsets showed no independent association with treatment outcomes C_LIO_LITissue segmentation on WSIs was limited by low heterogeneity in training data. C_LI Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=140 SRC="FIGDIR/small/26347935v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (39K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@13838e4org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1f34a6org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@b9a65borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@58d300_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.9%
2
European Journal of Cancer
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
3
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.5%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 27%
5.5%
5
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.5%
6
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
7
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.0%
8
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.4%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.2%
10
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
11
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.8%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.7%
13
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
14
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
15
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.4%
16
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
17
Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
18
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
19
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
20
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.1%
21
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
22
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
23
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.1%
24
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
25
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
26
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.1%
27
eClinicalMedicine
77 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
28
Cancer Research Communications
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
29
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
Breast Cancer Research
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%