Back

Risk Factor-Based Metabolomic Profiling Reveals Plasma Biomarkers of Hepatobiliary Cancer

Boekstegers, F. J.; Viallon, V.; Breeur, M.; Voican, C.; Perlemutter, G.; Chatziioannou, C.; Keski-Rahkonen, P.; Scherer, D.; Jenab, M.; Lorenzo Bermejo, J.

2026-03-10 gastroenterology
10.64898/2026.03.09.26347912 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and AimsHighly aggressive hepatobiliary tumours include gallbladder cancer (GBC), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA, eCCA) and ampulla of Vater cancer (AoV). We aimed to identify plasma biomarkers for the early diagnosis of hepatobiliary cancer by leveraging the metabolomic signatures of established clinical risk factors. MethodBased on 273,190 participants from the UK Biobank, we (1) identified metabolites associated with gallstone-related conditions (e.g. cholecystitis), primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and metabolic liver diseases (e.g. cirrhosis), and (2) evaluated the relationship between the identified metabolites and the risk of GBC, HCC, iCCA, eCCA and AoV. Findings were validated in an independent group of 227,809 participants from the UK Biobank. We also derived metabolomic scores summarizing the three risk-factor signatures and evaluated their ability to stratify cancer risk. ResultsWe identified 27 metabolites associated with gallstone-related conditions, 11 with PSC, and 34 with metabolic liver diseases, some of which showed associations with inconsistent directions across risk factors, suggesting distinct pathogenic processes. Several metabolites were associated with cancer risk in both the discovery and validation datasets, independently of established risk factors, predominantly for HCC (16 signals) and for iCCA (4), with one for GBC and none for eCCA and AoV. Metabolomic scores clearly distinguished individuals at high risk for HCC and iCCA. ConclusionThe preselection of plasma metabolites associated with established risk factors facilitated the subsequent identification and validation of biomarkers for early cancer detection. The identified metabolites suggest specific pathogenic pathways for each type of hepatobiliary cancer. Wider replication is urgently needed to advance toward clinical implementation. What you need to knowO_ST_ABSBACKGROUND AND CONTEXTC_ST_ABSClinical risk factors for hepatobiliary cancers often progress silently, making early identification of high-risk individuals difficult and highlighting the need for biological markers detectable before clinical diagnosis. NEW FINDINGSRisk-factor-based serum metabolomic profiling identified circulating metabolites that predict specific hepatobiliary cancers years before diagnosis, with strongest and most consistent signals for hepatocellular and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. LIMITATIONSClinical risk factors were assumed to be frequently underdiagnosed in UK Biobank, and event numbers were relatively small for some cancers, which may have reduced power and attenuated associations for less common endpoints. CLINICAL RESEARCH RELEVANCEThis study shows that serum metabolic profiles can identify individuals at increased risk for hepatobiliary cancers long before symptoms appear, particularly for hepatocellular and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. These findings support the development of precision risk-stratification strategies that may ultimately enable earlier surveillance. BASIC RESEARCH RELEVANCEBy first identifying metabolites linked to specific liver and biliary clinical conditions, the study clarifies which metabolites are indirectly associated with hepatobiliary cancers through known disease pathways. Testing these metabolites again while adjusting for diagnoses of those conditions then reveals which ones also show direct, pathway-independent associations with individual hepatobiliary cancers, providing clearer insight into cancer-specific metabolic mechanisms.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Hepatology Communications
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.0%
2
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.1%
3
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
Gut
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
5
Hepatology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
6
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.0%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.8%
8
Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology
41 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
9
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.4%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 46%
1.4%
11
American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 63%
1.4%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.2%
14
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
15
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
16
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
17
American Journal of Gastroenterology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
18
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
The Journal of Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
20
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
21
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Cell Metabolism
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
24
Journal of Hepatology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
25
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%