Automated Segmentation of Intracranial Arteries on 4D Flow MRI for Hemodynamic Quantification
Zhang, J.; Verschuur, A. S.; van Ooij, P.; Schrauben, E. M.; Bakker, M. K.; Nam, K. M.; van der Schaaf, I. C.; Tax, C. M. W.
Show abstract
Accurate vessel segmentation is essential for reliable hemodynamic quantification in 4D Flow MRI. Automated segmentation with deep learning offers a promising alternative to the time-consuming, operator-dependent manual segmentation, but its application is often hindered by the scarcity of labeled datasets. Moreover, the impact on downstream hemodynamic quantification remains to be investigated. We developed a transfer learning-based intracranial artery segmentation model using a 3D full-resolution nnU-Net, pretrained on 355 TOF-MRA scans and fine-tuned on 11 7T 4D Flow MRI scans. The model was compared with two published models (U-Net and DenseNet U-Net) against the manual reference, evaluating segmentation metrics on test sets of different resolutions and hemodynamic quantification. The proposed nnU-Net achieved the highest Dice score (>0.85), the lowest HD95 ([~]3 mm), and the highest ICCs in cross-sectional area (0.62-0.87, except PCAs) and mean blood flow (0.78- 0.98). For wall shear stress (WSS) quantification, nnU-Net segmentations achieved the closest agreement with the manual reference (mean = 1.57 {+/-} 0.63 Pa, ICC = 0.96; max = 2.16 {+/-} 1.05 Pa, ICC = 0.97) and minimal bias ([≤] 1.7%), whereas U-Net and DenseNet U-Net showed systematic under-(-5%) and overestimation (+7%), respectively. However, several vessel segments, including the ACA for DenseNet U-Net and the BA for U-Net, showed statistically significant differences (ANOVA post-hoc correction P < 0.05) in the flow-related metrics when compared with the manual reference. These results demonstrate that transfer learning with nnU-Net provides a robust, fully automated solution for intracranial artery analysis, and that segmentation accuracy directly affects 4D Flow MRI-derived hemodynamic quantification.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- FFCM-MRF: An accurate and generalizable cerebrovascular segmentation pipeline for humans and rhesus monkeys based on TOF-MRA 96%
- Reconstructing microvascular network skeletons from 3D images: what is the ground truth? 95%
- Uncertainty in cardiovascular digital twins despite non-normal errors in 4D flow MRI: identifying reliable biomarkers such as ventricular relaxation rate 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep Learning Based Cardiac Cine Segmentation – Transfer Learning Application to 7T Ultrahigh-Field MRI 95%
- Highly Accelerated Vessel-Selective Arterial Spin Labelling Angiography using Sparsity and Smoothness Constraints 95%
- Prospective Motion Correction and Automatic Segmentation of Penetrating Arteries in Phase Contrast MRI at 7 T 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Selective ensemble methods for deep learning segmentation of major vessels in invasive coronary angiography 95%
- Necessity and Impact of Specialization of Large Foundation Model for Medical Segmentation Tasks 93%
- Phase Recognition in Contrast-Enhanced CT Scans based on Deep Learning and Random Sampling 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A novel model to quantify blood transit time in cerebral arteries using ASL-based 4D magnetic resonance angiography with example clinical application in moyamoya disease 95%
- Robust estimation of dynamic cerebrovascular reactivity using breath-holding fMRI: application in diabetes and hypertension 92%
- Coupling between cerebrovascular oscillations and CSF flow fluctuation during wakefulness: An fMRI study 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.