Back

Automated Segmentation of Intracranial Arteries on 4D Flow MRI for Hemodynamic Quantification

Zhang, J.; Verschuur, A. S.; van Ooij, P.; Schrauben, E. M.; Bakker, M. K.; Nam, K. M.; van der Schaaf, I. C.; Tax, C. M. W.

2026-03-10 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.03.09.26347567 medRxiv
Show abstract

Accurate vessel segmentation is essential for reliable hemodynamic quantification in 4D Flow MRI. Automated segmentation with deep learning offers a promising alternative to the time-consuming, operator-dependent manual segmentation, but its application is often hindered by the scarcity of labeled datasets. Moreover, the impact on downstream hemodynamic quantification remains to be investigated. We developed a transfer learning-based intracranial artery segmentation model using a 3D full-resolution nnU-Net, pretrained on 355 TOF-MRA scans and fine-tuned on 11 7T 4D Flow MRI scans. The model was compared with two published models (U-Net and DenseNet U-Net) against the manual reference, evaluating segmentation metrics on test sets of different resolutions and hemodynamic quantification. The proposed nnU-Net achieved the highest Dice score (>0.85), the lowest HD95 ([~]3 mm), and the highest ICCs in cross-sectional area (0.62-0.87, except PCAs) and mean blood flow (0.78- 0.98). For wall shear stress (WSS) quantification, nnU-Net segmentations achieved the closest agreement with the manual reference (mean = 1.57 {+/-} 0.63 Pa, ICC = 0.96; max = 2.16 {+/-} 1.05 Pa, ICC = 0.97) and minimal bias ([&le;] 1.7%), whereas U-Net and DenseNet U-Net showed systematic under-(-5%) and overestimation (+7%), respectively. However, several vessel segments, including the ACA for DenseNet U-Net and the BA for U-Net, showed statistically significant differences (ANOVA post-hoc correction P < 0.05) in the flow-related metrics when compared with the manual reference. These results demonstrate that transfer learning with nnU-Net provides a robust, fully automated solution for intracranial artery analysis, and that segmentation accuracy directly affects 4D Flow MRI-derived hemodynamic quantification.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
72 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.6%
2
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.3%
3
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
4
NMR in Biomedicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.4%
6
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
7
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
8
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
9
Photoacoustics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
10
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
12
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
15
Journal of Medical Imaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
16
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 53%
0.9%
19
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
20
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
21
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
23
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
24
Frontiers in Neuroimaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
25
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Physics in Medicine & Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%