Back

A Two-Stage Questionnaire and Actigraphy Screening for Isolated REM Sleep Behavior Disorder in a Multicenter Cohort

Massimi, C. A.; Ricciardiello Mejia, G.; Metzger, A.; Ryu, K. H.; Marwaha, S.; Grzegorczyk, E.; Zhou, L.; Jacobs, E.; Gilyadov, B.; Kunney, C.; Ncube, L.; Parekh, A.; Mignot, E.; Elahi, F. M.; Winer, J.; Poston, K.; Brink-Kjaer, A.; During, E.

2026-03-10 neurology
10.64898/2026.03.09.26347106 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveIsolated rapid-eye-movement sleep behavior disorder is a prodromal marker of synucleinopathies. However, most cases remain undiagnosed due to the insufficient predictive value of questionnaires and limited access to confirmatory video-polysomnography. We assessed a two-stage screening strategy combining a brief questionnaire on rapid-eye-movement sleep behavior disorder symptoms and other prodromes with wrist actigraphy across multiple case-control cohorts. MethodsParticipants aged 40-80 without neurodegenerative disease were recruited from five cohorts; all cases were confirmed by video-polysomnography. The questionnaire was administered to 289 participants, and 236 underwent [≥]14 nights of home wrist actigraphy. The wearable-based algorithm was built on four movement features (mean motor activity, activity index, short or long immobile bouts, twitch activity). Models were trained with nested cross-validation using XGBoost. ResultsThe full retrospective cohort included 396 participants (99 cases, 297 controls; mean age 64 {+/-} 11; 55% male). The dream enactment question alone achieved an area under the curve of 0.85, which improved to 0.86 using the four-item questionnaire. Actigraphy alone achieved 82% sensitivity and 84% specificity. In the subgroup completing both assessments (75 cases, 54 controls), the two-stage protocol--questionnaire followed by actigraphy--yielded 68% sensitivity and 100% specificity using the dream-enactment question alone, and 73% sensitivity and 100% specificity using the four-item questionnaire. InterpretationA two-stage protocol combining questionnaire and actigraphy demonstrated high specificity and good sensitivity for detecting isolated rapid-eye-movement sleep behavior disorder in this multicenter cohort. This low-cost, scalable strategy is compatible with widely used wearable devices and warrants validation in community-based populations.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Sleep
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.1%
2
Journal of Sleep Research
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
3
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
6.3%
4
SLEEP
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
6
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.9%
8
Sleep Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
10
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
11
Movement Disorders
62 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.2%
12
npj Parkinson's Disease
89 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.6%
13
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
14
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.9%
15
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
17
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
18
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
19
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
20
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
23
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%