Back

Characterization of aliA and aliB deletion mutants reveals a dominant role of AliA in Haloferax volcanii lipoprotein lipidation

Hong, Y.; Garcia, A. A.; Kopelev, S.; Cote, J.; Pfeiffer, F.; Welander, P. V.; Schulze, S.; Pohlschroder, M.

2026-03-11 molecular biology
10.64898/2026.03.08.710431 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Protein lipidation is a widespread strategy for anchoring proteins to cellular membranes across all domains of life, yet the mechanisms underlying this process in archaea remain poorly understood. Recently, the first archaeal enzymes involved in lipobox-containing protein (lipoprotein) biogenesis, AliA and AliB, were identified and characterized in the model archaeon Haloferax volcanii. Although these paralogs share significant sequence similarity, distinct deletion phenotypes suggest differences in their substrate specificity and function. Here, we employed large-scale Triton X-114 fractionation followed by quantitative proteomics and lipid-specific mass spectrometry to systematically analyze AliA- and AliB-dependent lipoprotein lipidation. Deletion of aliA affected substantially more lipoproteins in Hfx. volcanii than deletion of aliB, markedly diminishing their TX-114 enrichment--indicating reduced hydrophobicity--and abolishing thioether-linked archaeol modification. This establishes AliA as the primary enzyme responsible for archaeal lipoprotein lipidation. In contrast, deletion of aliB affected only a small subset of lipoproteins and did not significantly reduce thioether-linked archaeol levels. In addition to defining distinct and non-redundant roles for AliA and AliB, this study provides the first large-scale experimental validation of predicted archaeal lipoproteins and identifies candidate components of the archaeal lipoprotein biogenesis pathway, substantially advancing mechanistic understanding and enabling improved lipoprotein prediction in this previously underexplored field.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.