Back

Chain entropy modulates cooperativity selectively within intermediate sub-populations during protein unfolding

Udgaonkar, J.; Kaushik, A.

2026-03-10 biophysics
10.64898/2026.03.08.710427 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Protein unfolding invariably appears to be a cooperative transition; yet, the molecular basis by which structural elements could unfold in a coordinated manner remains unresolved. Here, the unfolding mechanism of the naturally occurring heterodimeric protein double-chain monellin (dcMN) was characterized using site-specific time-resolved FRET and fluorescence anisotropy decay measurements made under equilibrium conditions. Although ensemble-averaged measurements suggested an apparently cooperative transition, population-level analysis using the maximum entropy method coupled to time-resolved FRET revealed pronounced conformational heterogeneity, with partially contracted (N-like) coexisting with partially expanded (U-like) sub-populations during unfolding. Time-resolved fluorescence anisotropy decay measurements independently demonstrated that local motional constraints are lost gradually and asynchronously across different regions of the protein. The N-like sub-populations underwent cooperative expansion across both intra- and inter-chain segments, indicating coordinated responses when inter-chain coupling is maintained. In contrast, the U-like sub-populations displayed pronounced chain-specific, non-cooperative behavior, consistent with independent unfolding of the two chains following loss of coupling. Comparison with a covalently linked single-chain variant demonstrates that chain connectivity suppresses heterogeneity and enforces coordinated unfolding. These results identify restriction of chain entropy arising from inter-chain coupling and covalent connectivity as a molecular determinant that governs whether heterogeneous intermediate sub-populations unfold cooperatively or in a chain-specific manner.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.