Back

Ribosome Molecular Aging Shapes Translation Dynamics

Botello, J. F.; Jiang, L.; Metzger, P. J.; Comi, T. J.; Abu-Alfa, A. A.; Yu, Q.; Ebert, M. S.; Lee, M.; Wiesner, L. W.; Butani, M.; Weaver, C. J.; Kosmrlj, A.; Cristea, I. M.; Brangwynne, C. P.

2026-03-09 cell biology
10.64898/2026.03.08.710403 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cellular homeostasis relies on continual renewal of cellular components, yet some complexes like ribosomes persist for long periods, raising the question of whether extended molecular age impacts functional fidelity. Here, we introduce a spatiotemporal mapping strategy to resolve biomolecular life stages, and show that intracellular ribosome aging alters translational dynamics at specific transcripts. Molecularly aged ribosomes exhibit impaired elongation at basic amino acid-rich sequences, leading to increased pausing, premature termination, and ribosome collisions. By profiling ribosomal RNA modifications, we find that molecular aging increases the collision propensity of specific ribosome subpopulations. Consistent with our findings, enrichment of aged ribosomes in cells amplifies molecular age-dependent translation defects. In vivo labeling of ribosomes in aged C. elegans demonstrates that molecularly aged ribosomes shape translational dynamics during organismal aging. These findings identify ribosome molecular age as a determinant of translational dynamics, and link molecular aging of a core gene-expression complex to organismal aging. HIGHLIGHTSO_LIA pulse-chase labeling strategy enables mapping subcellular demographics of macromolecular complexes in space and time. C_LIO_LIMolecular aging of ribosomes drives differential mRNA translation and shapes elongation dynamics. C_LIO_LIThe collision propensity of specific ribosome subpopulations increases with molecular age. C_LIO_LIOlder ribosomes shape translation dynamics during organismal aging. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.