Back

Combined impacts of invasive alien species and fire on ecosystems are complex, mostly negative, and understudied: a global review

Lima, C.; Fernandes, P.; Vale, C.; Goncalves, J.; Honrado, J.; Regos, A.; Vicente, J.

2026-03-10 ecology
10.64898/2026.03.08.710355 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Invasion-fire interactions can negatively impact ecosystems by driving biodiversity loss, altering ecological processes, modifying habitat structure, and compromising ecosystem functioning. Understanding how this interaction operates is essential to design effective management strategies that are successful in controlling both invasive alien species (IAS) and fire. Therefore, the present literature review aims to synthesize the current knowledge on invasion-fire interaction and its impacts on ecosystems, as well as identify knowledge gaps in the field. The review included 464 studies, from which information on context, species and fire characteristics, interaction outcomes, and research approaches was extracted. Fire generally promotes IAS, although studies on invasive animals are limited and no research has examined the effects of fire on fungi. Management through prescribed fire showed significantly better outcomes than wildfires in suppressing IAS, yet positive impacts still outnumbered the negative ones. In turn, IAS can change fire regimes causing regime shifts, but this direction of interaction is much less studied. Combined impacts of fire and IAS on ecosystems are predominantly negative, although interactions are complex and not always synergistic. Key knowledge gaps include geographic regions with known Invasion-fire interactions that remain underreported, a lack of broad-scale studies, limited management interventions, understudied taxa, and limited understanding of the combined effects on ecosystems. Remote sensing and laboratory experiments, which have been rarely used, could address some of these gaps.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 16%
12.4%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 8%
9.1%
3
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.3%
4
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.3%
5
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
6
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
7
Forest Ecology and Management
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
8
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
9
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 36%
2.1%
11
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
12
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
13
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
16
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
17
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
18
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
19
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
20
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.2%
21
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
22
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
23
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.9%
24
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
25
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
26
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
27
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 41%
0.9%
28
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
29
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
30
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%