Back

RRTF1 promotes touch-responses in Arabidopsis shoots independent of jasmonic acid

Park, S.; Finlayson, S. A.; Li, C.

2026-03-09 plant biology
10.64898/2026.03.08.710212 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Plants acclimate to mechanical stimuli such as touch and wind via thigmomorphogenesis, a suite of developmental responses that alter their growth and architecture. However, the early signaling mechanisms translating mechanoperception into long-term morphological changes remain incompletely understood. We investigated the role of the rapidly touch-induced transcription factor RRTF1 (REDOX RESPONSIVE TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR 1) in these processes. Phenotypically, under aggressive mechanical stimulation, rrtf1 mutant exhibited attenuated stunting (less height reduction). This suggests a key role for RRTF1 in promoting thigmomorphogenic responses under severe mechanical stimuli, though the rrtf1 mutant responded similarly to wild-type under gentle, repeated brushing. The alleviation of growth stunting in rrtf1 was largely jasmonic acid (JA)-independent. Transcriptome analysis at 10 minutes post-touch revealed that rrtf1 mutant maintained approximately 86% of wild-type touch-responsive gene expression. Nevertheless, RRTF1 modulated specific regulons, partly through an interplay with WRKY transcription factors, as evidenced by altered TF binding motif enrichment in RRTF1-specific differentially expressed genes. We conclude that RRTF1 acts as a modulator of early touch signaling in Arabidopsis shoots. It is not essential for the bulk of the initial transcriptional response but fine-tunes specific gene sets and plays a crucial role in calibrating long-term thigmomorphogenic development, particularly by promoting growth inhibition under severe mechanical stimulation. This study provides insights into the alleviation of touch-induced growth inhibition in rrft1 mutant, which might be relevant to breeding for crops that are planted in high density and experience constant physical contact with neighboring plants.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.6%
2
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
13.8%
3
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.7%
4
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
6.5%
6
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.1%
7
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.7%
8
Plant And Cell Physiology
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
9
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.0%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 52%
2.0%
11
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.6%
12
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.6%
14
Environmental and Experimental Botany
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
15
Plant and Cell Physiology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
16
Plant Science
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 53%
0.9%
18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.9%
19
Quantitative Plant Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
20
Annals of Botany
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
21
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.7%
22
Physiologia Plantarum
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
23
Planta
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%