Back

Investigating the Psychophysiological Effects of a Telehealth-Enabled Multi-sensory Environment on Anxiety among Young Adults in Educational Settings

Jafarifiroozabadi, R.; Kim, N.; Patel, H.; Lee, J.; Parker, S.

2026-03-10 health systems and quality improvement
10.64898/2026.03.08.26347897 medRxiv
Show abstract

Anxiety symptoms among adults in the U.S. have increased significantly in recent years, with higher prevalence among younger adults in rural areas. Using an experimental design, this industry-academia collaborative study evaluates the impact of a telehealth-enabled multi-sensory environment on anxiety levels among young adults. A sample of 30 participants aged 18-25 was recruited from a university population in the U.S. Anxiety levels were assessed during three five-minute episodes: baseline, exposure to Trier Social Stress Test (TSST), and physical sensory environment with telehealth (pre-recorded guided meditation). Physiological data-- electrodermal activity (EDA), number and duration of eye fixations and saccades-- were collected continuously using sensors (EmbracePlus) and eye-tracking (Tobii Pro Glasses). Subjective data were measured using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and semi-structured exit interviews. Pairwise comparisons based on complete datasets from 25 participants revealed a significant decrease in EDA (P < .001), mean frequency of saccades (P = .011) and eye fixations (P < .001), and mean state anxiety scores (P < .001) among participants following TSST, indicating the effectiveness of the telehealth-enabled multi-sensory environment in anxiety reduction. Semi-structured interviews also highlighted participants preferences regarding key sensory environment features, including tactile, form, lighting, furniture types, and configurations. Findings from this study will inform the design and implementation of telehealth-enabled multi-sensory environments in the future educational settings to improve anxiety symptoms among young adults.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 11%
17.4%
3
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.1%
5
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.3%
6
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
7
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.0%
9
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
10
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
11
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
12
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
13
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
14
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.2%
15
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
16
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
17
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
18
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
21
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%