Evaluation of Multifaceted Patient-Peer Delivered Intervention for Type-2 Diabetes Control and Remission in Rural Locations in India: Open-Label Cluster Randomised Pilot Study
Sharma, K. K.; Hegde, S. K. B.; Valaulikar, R.; Garigipati, S.; Ernst-Stegeman, A.-M.; Coles, E.; Pijl, H.; Hazarika, N.; Gali, D.; Choudhury, M.; Vig, A.; Baruah, C.; Ballala, R.; Boers, A. C.; Bredius, L.; Habib, G. L.; Vergou, E.; Yousuf, H.; van der Zilj, N.; Lodha, S.; Hofstra, L.; van den Berg, J.; Gupta, R.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of a multifaceted lifestyle intervention delivered by patient peers and supported by healthcare workers and technology to achieve control and remission of type 2 diabetes. MethodsOpen-label, cluster-randomised controlled trial conducted in rural Assam, India. Type 2 diabetes patients identified through a screening program in 25 villages (clusters) were randomly assigned to intervention or standard care. At baseline, all participants underwent assessment of diet, physical activity, quality of life, medicine intake, physical measurements and biochemical evaluation. The intervention was a contextually designed package, delivered during fortnightly group counselling by patient-peers and healthcare workers, focusing on carbohydrate-restricted healthy diet, physical activity, diabetes management, and medication de-escalation. Nutrition data were transferred to the study management for suggestions and modifications on smartphones. Intervention was implemented for 3 months, when anthropometric and biochemical parameters were reassessed. Primary outcomes were diabetes control (HbA1c, fasting glucose) and remission (HbA1c <6.5% without medications). Modified intention-to-treat analysis has been performed. Results353 patients in rural locations (intervention=193, standard care=160) were enrolled. Baseline sociodemographic, lifestyle, clinical and biochemical parameters were not different in intervention and standard-care groups. At 3 months, in the intervention vs standard-care group there was significantly lower median (interquartile range) HbA1c 7.9% (7.0-8.7) vs 8.6% (7.6-9.8), p<0.001; and fasting glucose 188.0 mg/dl (146.2-253.5) vs 210.0 mg/dl (166.0-282.0), p=0.001. Diabetes remission was in 9 participants (5.0%) in intervention vs 4 (2.7%) in standard care (p=0.249). ConclusionsPatient-peers delivered and healthcare worker- and technology-supported diet and lifestyle intervention for type 2 diabetes led to significant improvement in diabetes control in rural patients in India. Diabetes remission was observed in a low proportion. Trial registrationRegistered with Clinical Trials Registry of India at www.ctri.nic.in; registration number CTRI/2022/03/041302 dated 22 March 2022. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDYO_LIMultifaceted diet and lifestyle intervention for type-2 diabetes control and remission, delivered by patient-peers with health worker and technology support, is feasible in rural populations in India. C_LIO_LIThis cluster-randomised trial shows that the intervention led to significantly better diabetes control. Diabetes remission occurred in a small proportion. C_LIO_LILarger and longer prospective studies are required to confirm the effectiveness of such lifestyle strategies for diabetes control and remission in India, lower-middle, and low-income countries. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The iDiabetes Platform: Enhanced Phenotyping of Patients with Diabetes for Precision Diagnosis, Prognosis and Treatment- study protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled study 94%
- A randomised controlled trial of preconception lifestyle intervention on maternal and offspring health in people with increased risk of gestational diabetes: study protocol for the BEFORE THE BEGINNING trial 94%
- Cohort profile: The Nanjing Diabetes Cohort database – a population-based surveillance cohort 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring support needs of people living with diabetes during the coronavirus COVID-19 pandemic: insights from a UK survey 94%
- Nothing About Us Without Us: A Scoping Review and Priority-Setting Partnership in Type 1 Diabetes and Exercise 94%
- The use of a participatory patient engagement research project to meaningfully engage those with lived experience of diabetes and homelessness 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Determinants of glycemic control among persons living with type 2 diabetes mellitus attending a district hospital in Ghana 96%
- Predictors of glycemic control, quality of life and diabetes self-management of patients with diabetes mellitus at a tertiary hospital in Ghana 95%
- Michigan men’s diabetes project II: protocol for peer-led diabetes self-management education and long-term support in Black men 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prevalence of, and risk factors for, diabetes and prediabetes in Bangladesh: Evidence from the national survey using a multilevel Poisson regression model with a robust variance 94%
- Regional Prevalence of Hypertension Among People Diagnosed with Diabetes in Africa, A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 94%
- Acceptability of a community health worker- led health literacy intervention on lifestyle modification among hypertensive and diabetes patients in the City of Harare, Zimbabwe 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparing azithromycin to amoxicillin in the management of uncomplicated severe acute malnutrition in Burkina Faso: a pilot randomized trial 91%
- Healthcare professionals and students awareness of Chagas disease: design and validation of ChaLKS (Chagas Level of Knowledge Scale) 89%
- Effect of a behavior change intervention on complementary food contamination in rural Bangladesh: a cluster-randomized controlled trial 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.