Back

A general methodology for liver sinusoid fenestration analysis based on 3D electron microscopy data

Pohar, C.; Rekik, Y.; Phan, M. S.; Gallet, B.; Desroches-Castane, A.; Chevallet, M.; Tinevez, J.-Y.; Tillet, E.; Vigano, N.; Jouneau, P.-H.; Deniaud, A.

2026-03-09 cell biology
10.64898/2026.03.07.710307 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The liver has a complex architecture composed of millions of lobules. Within these lobules, hepatocytes, the main hepatic cells, are organized in rows separated by blood capillaries known as sinusoids. These capillaries are lined by liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSEC) that form a very specific fenestrated endothelium essential for the exchange of metabolites and proteins between the blood and hepatocytes. Alterations in the size and number of LSEC fenestrations are associated with the onset and the progression of various liver diseases. The analysis of liver architecture is thus of utmost importance for advancing our knowledge of liver ultrastructure and its alterations. Liver architecture has been studied since decades, mainly using 2D electron microscopy, and more recently using advanced super-resolution fluorescence microscopy. In recent years, volume electron microscopy techniques, including focused ion beam-scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM) progressed and nowadays enable the 3D reconstruction of biological ultrastructures down to nanometer resolution. However, the analysis of large volumes (e.g., several tens of {micro}m3) remains challenging due to various constraints in the segmentation of large datasets. In the current study, we developed a workflow to semi-automatically segment hepatic sinusoids from FIB-SEM mice liver datasets using the CNN-based (convolutional neural network) tool known as "nnU-Net", after fine-tuning a ground truth model. We also implemented tools for semi-automatic quantification of LSEC fenestrae diameters and sinusoid porosity from segmented datasets. This workflow enabled us to compare the distribution of LSEC fenestrae diameters in wild-type versus Bmp9-deleted mice, a hepatic factor known to be involved in fenestration maintenance. Our results confirm the importance of BMP9 for LSEC differentiation. Therefore, the developed methodology represents a valuable tool for characterizing the fenestrated endothelium under various physiological and pathological conditions.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Structural Biology
58 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.4%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 10%
8.4%
3
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.4%
4
Journal of Microscopy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.3%
6
Journal of Cell Science
353 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.2%
7
Journal of Structural Biology: X
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.6%
9
SoftwareX
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
10
Cytometry Part A
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
11
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.8%
13
Data in Brief
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 42%
1.7%
15
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
Biological Imaging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
17
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
18
Laboratory Investigation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
19
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
20
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
21
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
22
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
23
Microscopy and Microanalysis
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
24
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.1%
25
Journal of Biophotonics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
26
Journal of Biomedical Optics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
27
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
28
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
29
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
Advanced Biology
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%