Back

Predicting life-history traits in a stored bean petst beetle Callosobruchus chinensis (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae) using machine learning

Gu, X.; Tuda, M.

2026-03-07 ecology
10.64898/2026.03.07.710260 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Life-history traits play an important role in insect population dynamics and ecological processes. The azuki bean beetle Callosobruchus chinensis is a common pest of stored legumes and is also widely used as a model species in ecological and evolutionary research. In this study, we tested whether machine learning models could be used to estimate several traits of C. chinensis, including elytral length, development time and adult lifespan. Experimental data were obtained from laboratory populations. The dataset included biological and environmental variables such as strain, treatment condition, developmental day, sex, temperature, and CO2. Six different machine learning models were tested, including linear regression, random forest, support vector machine (SVM), neural network, gradient boosting and AdaBoost. Model performance was evaluated using cross-validation. The coefficient of determination (R2) and root mean square error (RMSE) were used to measure prediction accuracy. Prediction accuracy differed among traits. Elytral length showed relatively higher predictability than the other traits, while development time was difficult to estimate in most models. Lifespan was easier to predict than the other traits, and the neural network produced one of the highest prediction accuracies among the tested models. Feature importance analysis also showed that factors such as sex and treatment condition contributed to variation in several traits. Machine learning models therefore helped reveal relationships among biological variables and life-history traits in C. chinensis. Combining ecological experiments with machine learning analysis may help improve our understanding of insect traits and may support future studies in insect ecology and pest management.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Insects
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.7%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 9%
18.9%
3
Pest Management Science
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.5%
5
Ecological Entomology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
6
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
7
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.6%
8
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
9
Journal of Economic Entomology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
10
Insect Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
11
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
12
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
13
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
14
Parasites & Vectors
57 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
15
Journal of Medical Entomology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
16
Oecologia
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
17
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
19
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
20
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.6%
21
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
22
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
23
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
24
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
25
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%