Back

A phase 2a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial of the SARS-CoV-2-specific monoclonal antibody AER002 in people with Long COVID

Peluso, M. J.; Ryder, D.; Dalhuisen, T.; Chu, D. H. T.; Williams, M. C.; Rodriguez, A. E.; LaFranchi, B.; Vinden, J.; Fehrman, E. A.; Huang, B.; Hoh, R.; Asare, K. A.; Bellon Pizarro, K.; Rahman, M.; de Narvaez, E.; Painter, M. M.; Wherry, E. J.; Swank, Z. N.; Hansen, L. L.; Walt, D. R.; Fukazawa, Y.; Sekar, A.; Bellan, S. E.; Tieu, H.; Asiago, J.; Bhuyan, P.; Venkayya, R.; Flavell, R. R.; VanBrocklin, H.; Kelly, J. D.; Hsue, P. Y.; Durstenfeld, M. S.; Hunt, P. W.; Calabrese, L.; Somsouk, M.; Martin, J. N.; Glidden, D. V.; Deitchman, A. N.; Henrich, T. J.; Deeks, S. G.

2026-03-09 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.03.07.26347857 medRxiv
Show abstract

Long COVID is a disabling chronic illness with no proven treatments. Persistence of SARS-CoV-2 has been proposed as a biological driver of the disease. We conducted a placebo-controlled, double-blind, 2:1 randomized mechanistic trial of the SARS-CoV-2-specific monoclonal antibody AER002 in 36 participants who met the World Health Organization case definition of Long COVID. After baseline characterization, participants received a single infusion and were followed for 360 days. The primary endpoint was the PROMIS-29 Physical Health Summary Score (PHSS) at 90 days; secondary and exploratory endpoints included patient-reported and objective measures of physical, cognitive, and neurologic function as well as blood-, imaging-, and tissue-based biomarkers. While AER002 was safe and well tolerated, no significant differences in physical health, quality of life, objective measures of physical function or cognition, or blood-based biomarkers were demonstrated between the treatment and control arms. In a post-hoc analysis, participants with a lower baseline SARS-CoV-2 antibody level and higher drug exposure were more likely to express a perceived treatment benefit based on the Patient Global Impression of Change scale (p<0.05 for anti-S, S1, and RBD). Although AER002 was not efficacious in this proof-of-concept study of people with broadly defined Long COVID, our findings could inform recruitment or dosing strategies employed in future trials using monoclonal antibodies to target viral persistence as a driver of Long COVID.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.1%
2
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.4%
3
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.8%
4
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.8%
5
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.3%
6
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
7
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
8
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.1%
9
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
10
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
11
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
12
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
13
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
14
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
16
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
18
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.3%
20
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
21
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.2%
22
The Lancet Rheumatology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
23
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.8%
26
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
27
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
28
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 75%
0.7%
29
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.6%