Impact of Image Bit Depth Reduction on Deep Learning Performance in Chest Radiograph Analysis: A Multi-institutional Study
Takita, H.; Mitsuyama, Y.; Walston, S. L.; Saito, K.; Sugibayashi, T.; Okamoto, M.; Suh, C. H.; Ueda, D.
Show abstract
PurposeMedical imaging typically generates 12- to 16-bit formats, yet conversion to 8-bit is often required. While deep learning has been widely explored in medical imaging, the influence of image bit depth on model performance is not fully understood. This study evaluates the impact of conversion from 16-bit to 8-bit for sex, age, and obesity classification using deep learning. Materials and methodsIn this retrospective, multi-institutional study, we analyzed 100,002 chest radiographs from 48,047 participants across three institutions. Three convolutional neural network architectures (ResNet52, EfficientNetB2, and ConvNeXtSmall) were trained on both 16-bit and 8-bit versions of the images. Model performance was evaluated using internal test datasets, randomly split multiple times, and an external test dataset. Statistical analysis included paired comparisons of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) values, with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. ResultsAcross all architectures and classification tasks, differences between 16-bit and 8-bit model performance were minimal (mean differences ranging from -0.218% to 0.184%). Statistical analyses revealed no significant differences in AUC-ROC values between bit depths for any model-task combination (all p-values > 0.05 after Bonferroni correction). Effect sizes were small to moderate (Cohens d ranging from -0.415 to 0.391). ConclusionReducing image bit depth from 16-bit to 8-bit does not significantly impact the performance of deep learning models in chest radiograph analysis. These findings suggest that 8-bit images can be used for deep learning applications in medical imaging without compromising model performance, potentially allowing for more efficient data storage and processing.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Classification of Hyper-scale Multimodal Imaging Datasets 96%
- Uncovering the effects of model initialization on deep model generalization: A study with adult and pediatric chest X-ray images 94%
- Designing a computer-assisted diagnosis system for cardiomegaly detection and radiology report generation 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhancing Semantic Segmentation in Chest X-Ray Images through Image Preprocessing: ps-KDE for Pixel-wise Substitution by Kernel Density Estimation 97%
- ai-corona : Radiologist-Assistant Deep Learning Framework for COVID-19 Diagnosis in Chest CT Scans 95%
- Automated Detection of COVID-19 through Convolutional Neural Network using Chest x-ray images 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Segmentation of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and surrounding vessels in CT images using deep convolutional neural networks and Texture Descriptors 95%
- COVID-Classifier: An automated machine learning model to assist in the diagnosis of COVID-19 infection in chest x-ray images 94%
- Toward Understanding COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Deep-learning-based Approach for Severity Analysis and Monitoring the Disease 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Auto-detection of motion artifacts on CT pulmonary angiograms with a physician-trained AI algorithm 94%
- An Explainable Web-Based Diagnostic System for Alzheimer's Disease Using XRAI and Deep Learning on Brain MRI 93%
- A Machine Learning Ensemble Based on Radiomics to Predict BI-RADS Category and Reduce the Biopsy Rate of Ultrasound-Detected Suspicious Breast Masses 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Fully Automated Explainable Abdominal CT Contrast Media Phase Classification Using Organ Segmentation and Machine Learning 96%
- SCU-Net: A deep learning method for segmentation and quantification of breast arterial calcifications on mammograms 94%
- Phase Recognition in Contrast-Enhanced CT Scans based on Deep Learning and Random Sampling 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.