Back

Using a co-design approach to develop aquatic reactive balance training for fall prevention

Slodownik, A. O.-; Faria, J. O.; Thavarajah, S.; Pacholczyk, K.; Blain, B.; Walker, J.; Wiener, M.; Mansfield, A.; Chan Carusone, S.

2026-03-09 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.64898/2026.03.07.26347842 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundFalls are a major health concern among older adults, leading to injury, reduced independence, and increased healthcare cost. Reactive balance training can reduce fall risk, but barriers such as fear, joint discomfort, and harness burden limit its use - barriers that aquatic training may help overcome. ObjectiveTo design an aquatic reactive balance training (AquaReBal) program for older adults, integrating end-user perspectives to enhance safety, accessibility, and engagement. MethodsUsing a participatory design approach, we engaged older adult partners, physiotherapists, and researchers in iterative phases including literature review, stakeholder consultations, practical pool sessions, and feedback meetings. Data were collected through online meetings, surveys, and real-time observations, following the Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public 2 framework. ResultsThree older adult partners and a multidisciplinary team co-designed the AquaReBal protocol through two participatory design sessions, one practical pool session, and two internal team sessions. Key recommendations from partners included using a vest instead of a hip belt for perturbations, addressing pool depth visibility, and creating an introductory package with practical information for participants. Partners emphasized safety, instructor support, and social engagement as critical for adherence and satisfaction. ConclusionThe co-design process enabled the development of an AquaReBal protocol tailored to older adults needs and preferences, demonstrating potential for broader implementation.

Published in PLOS One · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.