Back

A clinical pilot study for personalized risk?based breast cancer screening utilizing the polygenic risk score

Hovda, T.; Sober, S.; Padrik, P.; Kruuv-Kao, K.; Grindedal, E. M.; Vamre, T. B. A.; Eikeland, E.; Hofvind, S.; Sahlberg, K. K.

2026-03-16 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.03.07.26347839 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPopulation-based mammographic screening is primarily age-based. However, breast cancer risk is multifactorial, and women may benefit from personalized risk-based screening. This pilot study aimed to explore the use of polygenic risk score (PRS) as a tool for risk stratification in personalized screening. MethodsWe included 80 women aged 40-49 years referred for clinical mammography. Exclusion criteria were prior breast cancer or premalignant breast disease, and previous genetic testing. After DNA collection, PRS was calculated from 2805 Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs). Screening recommendations were based on each participants relative 10-year breast cancer risk estimated from PRS and compared with the 10-year risk of an average woman of the same age. Women with a self-reported family history of cancer meeting standard criteria were referred for gene panel testing for pathogenic variants in high-risk genes. A follow up questionnaire regarding participants experiences was distributed 6-9 months after PRS testing. ResultsMean age was 45.2 years (SD 2.8). Mean relative 10-year breast cancer risk was 1.18 (SD 0.57). Based on PRS, 40 participants were recommended standard biennial screening 50-69 years, while 40 were advised to begin biennial screening before age 50. Among these, 7 were recommended annual mammography from when their 10-year risk reached twice that of an average 50-year-old. Twenty-one women underwent gene panel testing; no pathogenic variants in breast cancer genes were identified. Five women were advised annual mammography from 40-60 years due to family history of breast cancer, regardless of PRS. Most respondents viewed breast cancer risk assessment positively and did not report increased anxiety after testing. ConclusionsPolygenic risk score testing may influence current screening recommendations and contribute to more personalized risk-based breast cancer screening strategies.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 11%
15.3%
2
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.7%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.6%
4
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.5%
5
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.1%
6
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
7
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
8
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
9
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
10
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
11
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
12
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
13
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
14
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
15
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
16
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
17
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
18
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
19
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
20
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
21
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
22
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
23
Journal of Medical Genetics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
24
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
25
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.9%
26
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
27
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
28
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
29
BMC Research Notes
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
30
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%