Back

Bumble bees that follow a stricter routine innovate less: Foraging behaviors, environmental complexity, and how they relate to novel problem solving

McWaters, S. R.; Kearsley, J. J.; Kikuchi, D. W.; Polnaszek, T. J.; Dornhaus, A.

2026-03-09 animal behavior and cognition
10.64898/2026.03.06.710156 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The ability of animals to innovate - solve novel problems - can shape their ecology and evolution. Here we investigate how individual traits and environmental complexity relate to successful solving of a novel problem. We presented foraging bumble bees (Bombus impatiens) with artificial flowers of not-previously-encountered shapes and recorded the bees latency to access nectar. We measured individual foraging traits across multiple trips with simple flowers that did not require innovation, and bees were foraging either in a simple or complex environment (cluttered flight arena). Bees in complex environments took longer to find and were less likely to land on novel flowers, indicating that environmental complexity may take up cognitive resources and make search more difficult. However, we did not find an effect of environmental treatment on the ability or time to access reward in novel flowers once bees had landed on them. In contrast, behavioral traits significantly predicted how quickly bees solved novel flowers. In particular, overall foraging tempo as well as routine formation, i.e. how much bees followed a fixed route on known flowers, predicted innovation - faster bees innovated faster, and bees with more repetitive foraging sequences were slower to solve the novel tasks. Overall, while the degree of evolutionary novelty in tasks or solutions is always hard to evaluate, our findings demonstrate that environment and individual traits may affect innovation in different ways. Individuals in simple environments may be more likely to detect, and individuals that are generally faster and have a lower tendency to develop fixed routines may be more likely to solve, novel tasks.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
18.3%
2
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.9%
3
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.2%
4
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.2%
5
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.9%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 30%
2.8%
9
Animal Cognition
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
10
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
11
Integrative And Comparative Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
12
Evolutionary Ecology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
Behavioral Ecology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
16
Integrative Organismal Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
17
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.5%
18
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.3%
19
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.3%
20
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
21
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.9%
22
Ethology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
23
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Journal of Comparative Physiology A
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
25
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
27
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.7%
28
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%