Back

Prospective ICH Q2(R2)-aligned total-error validation of label-free untargeted proteomics for host cell protein quantification in biotherapeutics

Khalil, S.; Dierick, J.-F.; Bourguignon, P.; Plisnier, M.

2026-03-08 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.03.06.710150 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Untargeted proteomics enables quantitative determination of host cell proteins (HCPs) in biotherapeutics, yet no workflow has been validated under ICH Q2(R2) for regulated quality control. We report a prospective validation of label-free untargeted proteomics for HCP quantification using a total-error (TE) approach. A stable isotope-labeled whole-proteome standard was spiked into NISTmAb at seven levels (20-80 ng). Four independent assays (198 injections) supported hierarchical replication and one-way random-effects ANOVA variance decomposition with Welch-Satterthwaite adjustment. Dual entrapment analysis demonstrated empirical peptide-level false discovery proportions below 1% at q = 0.01. Deterministic parsimony inference ensured invariant protein-group definition. Weighted least-squares regression (R{superscript 2} = 0.993) identified stable proportional compression with recoveries of 81-85%. Repeatability dominated the variance structure (median CV 2.7%); intermediate precision total SD ranged from 0.69% to 3.81% over the validated range. Accuracy profiles integrating empirical bias with a log- log variance model showed 95% {beta}-expectation and 95/95 content tolerance intervals fully contained within {+/-}30%, with a lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of 20 ng. Abundance-stratified TE analysis revealed concentration-dependent calibration heterogeneity masked by aggregate-level estimation; stratum-specific {beta}-expectation intervals within {+/-}35% defined an abundance-aware LLOQ of 3.6 ppm (P95 = 3.87 ppm). Robustness under independent search software (FragPipe, CCC = 0.998, LoA {+/-}9%) and cross-platform acquisition (Astral, CCC = 0.980, LoA {+/-}18%) remained within predefined {+/-}30% agreement limits. System suitability criteria were derived empirically from validation performance. This is the first prospective ICH Q2(R2)-aligned validation of untargeted proteomics for HCP quantification, with a statistical framework applicable to other high-dimensional analytical methods requiring regulatory qualification. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=113 SRC="FIGDIR/small/710150v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (29K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1f5331aorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@ee2234org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@798eaorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@c84034_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.2%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 16%
10.4%
3
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.4%
4
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.0%
5
Analytica Chimica Acta
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
The Analyst
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
7
JACS Au
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
8
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.4%
9
Communications Chemistry
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
10
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
11
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.5%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.4%
13
ACS Central Science
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
14
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
15
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
17
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.9%
18
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
Analytical Biochemistry
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
20
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.7%
21
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
22
Journal of Proteomics
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
23
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
Chemical Science
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
PROTEOMICS
35 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
26
Talanta
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
27
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.5%