Back

Multitasking boosts muscular endurance task performance due to elevated arousal level unattainable by the endurance task alone

Nagisa, S.; Oblak, E.; Shimojo, S.; Shibata, K.

2026-03-10 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.03.06.710139 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Multitasking is generally regarded as detrimental to performance. This deterioration effect is typically explained by the interference among tasks due to the limited capacity of information-processing resources, which in turn reduces the performance in each task. Contrary to this general view, we report evidence for a facilitation effect of multitasking on performance. This facilitation effect was observed in multitasking on a handgrip muscular endurance task and cognitive task, which are known to have little interference with each other. Specifically, we found that performance in the endurance task was facilitated with the difficulty of the concurrent cognitive task. This facilitation effect was mediated by additional pupil dilation due to the cognitive task. Increased effort with the difficulty of the cognitive task cannot explain the facilitated performance in the irrelevant endurance task. Instead, they suggest that the cognitive task elevated overall arousal to a level unattainable by the endurance task alone, which in turn facilitated performance in the irrelevant endurance task. To further test this arousal account, we manipulated participants motivation to the cognitive task by reward without changing its difficulty and found the same pattern of results. Thus, it is not effort or motivation specific to the cognitive task but rather overall arousal level that underlies the facilitation effect. These results unveiled a previously overlooked mechanism: a multitasking-induced arousal boost. Our findings suggest that multitasking can facilitate performance when the net effect of adding a concurrent task is governed less by the capacity limitation and more by the elevation of overall arousal.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 1%
16.8%
2
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 8%
8.1%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.9%
5
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.1%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 19%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
8
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.4%
9
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.4%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 11%
3.4%
11
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
12
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.3%
13
Cognition
44 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
14
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
15
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
16
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.4%
17
Psychophysiology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
18
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
19
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.3%
20
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.2%
21
Psychological Review
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
22
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
23
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
24
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.9%
25
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
26
Consciousness and Cognition
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
27
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
28
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
29
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%