Back

A mouse model of autosomal dominant spastic ataxia and myopathy caused by a mutation in Tuba4a

Hines, T. J.; Funke, J. R.; Pratt, S. L.; Rice, A. D.; Twiss, J. L.; Burgess, R. W.

2026-03-09 genetics
10.64898/2026.03.06.710113 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Hereditary ataxias are a heterogeneous group of neurodegenerative disorders characterized by impaired balance and coordination, often due to cerebellar dysfunction. Despite advances in identifying genetic causes, animal models remain essential for dissecting underlying mechanisms and testing therapeutic strategies. Here we describe a mouse model of spastic ataxia and myopathy caused by a missense mutation in Tuba4a (n.A626C, p.Gln176Pro). In an ENU mutagenesis screen, a male C57BL/6J mouse exhibiting muscle wasting and an intention tremor starting at approximately 4 weeks-of-age was identified. The male was bred by in vitro fertilization to BALB/cByJ oocyte donors. Genetic mapping determined dominant inheritance and localized the mutation to Chromosome 1. Genome sequencing revealed single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in serine threonine kinase 36 (Stk36Y1003N) and alpha-tubulin 4A (Tuba4aQ176P) in the mapping interval. These SNPs were CRISPR-engineered into C57BL/6J mice, which confirmed the Tuba4aQ176P variant as the causative mutation. Mutant mice are normal at 3 weeks, except for decrement in muscle response following repetitive nerve stimulation. However, by 30 days these mice have ataxia, Purkinje neuron degeneration, and extensive skeletal muscle defects, which contribute to a decreased lifespan. Dominant TUBA4A mutations in humans are associated with spastic ataxia type 11 (SPAX11), congenital myopathy type 26 (CMYO26), and frontotemporal dementia/amyotrophic lateral sclerosis type 9 (FTDALS9). Our mice exhibit hallmark features of SPAX11 and CMYO26, but do not show motor neuron degeneration. This specificity makes this model a valuable tool for studying cell-type selective effects of TUBA4A mutations in neurodegeneration and myopathy.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Acta Neuropathologica
51 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.0%
2
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
9.8%
3
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.2%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 24%
8.2%
5
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
8.0%
6
Molecular Therapy
71 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.2%
8
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.0%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.7%
10
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.5%
11
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.5%
12
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.3%
13
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
14
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
15
Movement Disorders
62 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
16
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.2%
17
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
18
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
70 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
19
Neurology Genetics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.9%
21
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
23
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Experimental & Molecular Medicine
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
26
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.6%
27
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.6%