Stage-dependent chromatin accessibility remodeling defines an architectural state in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy myoblasts
Losi, F.; Fosso, B.; Tupler, R.; Salsi, V.
Show abstract
Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) has been linked to alterations in higher-order genome organization, yet how these structural perturbations shape chromatin accessibility across muscle developmental stages remains unclear. Here, we identify a stage-specific architectural chromatin accessibility state that defines proliferating FSHD myoblasts. Using genome-wide ATAC-seq profiling of primary human myoblasts and differentiated myotubes, analyzed using the telomere-to-telomere (T2T-CHM13) human reference genome, we map the genome-wide distribution and hierarchical organization of this state. We detect extensive chromatin accessibility remodeling, with over 12,000 differentially accessible regions in myoblasts and marked attenuation of this state upon terminal differentiation. Remodeling predominantly affects intronic and distal intergenic regions enriched in non-coding and repeat-proximal sequences, indicating redistribution of regulatory accessibility beyond promoter-centered regulation. At the chromosome scale, accessibility losses cluster within megabase domains enriched in heterochromatin- and nucleolus-associated regions, revealing coordinated reorganization of nuclear architecture. No reproducible accessibility changes occur within the D4Z4 repeat array or canonical DUX4 target loci, demonstrating that early architectural remodeling in FSHD myoblasts is largely uncoupled from sustained DUX4-driven programs. These findings these findings define a transient architectural chromatin accessibility state that emerges in proliferating FSHD myoblasts and is largely resolved upon terminal differentiation. Our work supports a model in which disruption of higher-order genome organization represents an early and stage-restricted determinant of disease susceptibility.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Suv39h-catalysed H3K9me3 is critical for euchromatic genome organisation and the maintenance of gene transcription 95%
- Cell type- and chromosome-specific chromatin landscapes and DNA replication programs of Drosophila testis tumor stem-cell like cells 95%
- MYC overexpression leads to increased chromatin interactions at superenhancers and c-Myc binding sites 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Characterising open chromatin identifies novel cis-regulatory elements important for paraxial mesoderm formation and axis extension 95%
- Temporal constraints on enhancer usage shape the regulation of limb gene transcription 95%
- β-actin dependent chromatin remodeling mediates compartment level changes in 3D genome architecture 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- DNA elements tether canonical Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 to human genes 95%
- Epigenetic reprogramming of a distal developmental enhancer cluster drives SOX2 overexpression in breast and lung cancer 94%
- Assessing genome-wide dynamic changes in enhancer activity during early mESC differentiation by FAIRE-STARR-seq 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The chromatin remodeller CHD4 regulates transcription factor binding to both prevent activation of silent enhancers and maintain active regulatory elements 96%
- ZMYM2 controls human transposable element transcription through distinct co-regulatory complexes 95%
- Human ORC/MCM density is low in active genes and correlates with replication time but does not solely define replication initiation zones 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- In vivo dissection of a clustered-CTCF domain boundary reveals developmental principles of regulatory insulation 96%
- Cohesin promotes stochastic domain intermingling to ensure proper regulation of boundary-proximal genes 95%
- High affinity enhancer-promoter interactions can bypass CTCF/cohesin-mediated insulation and contribute to phenotypic robustness 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.