Back

Paralysis Efficiency (ED50) Scales Linearly with Lethality (LD50) in Spider Venoms

Lyons, K.; Leonard, D.; McSharry, L.; Martindale, M.; Collier, B.; Vitkauskaite, A.; Dunbar, J. P.; Dugon, M. M.; Healy, K.

2026-03-09 pharmacology and toxicology
10.64898/2026.03.06.710087 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Historically, venom potencies have been assessed using measures of lethality, such as the median lethal dose (LD50). However, venoms may be selected primarily for their ability to rapidly incapacitate rather than cause mortality, meaning LD50 may not capture the efficacy of venoms in an ecological and evolutionary context. To capture this context, recent studies have adapted measures that assess venoms ability to rapidly incapacitate, such as the median effective dose (ED50). However, while ED50 values are expected to provide a more proximate assessment of ecological variation in venom potency, it is unknown whether historically available LD50 values are still useful proxies of ecologically relevant potency or whether they capture independent axes of venom variation. Here, we test the relationship between LD50 and ED50 in spider venoms by experimentally estimating LD50 and ED50 for 12 species and collating additional potency data for 40 species retrieved from the literature. We observed an isometric relationship between LD50 and ED50 in both analyses, showing these potency measures are both strongly coupled, with an increase in paralysis efficiency associated with a similar increase in lethality. Our results suggest that the functional aspects of venom potency, paralysis and lethality, are intrinsically linked, and due to this strong mechanistic coupling, historically available LD50 values may be used to compare general venom potencies in spiders, provided that they are based on the same prey model.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.4%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.4%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.4%
4
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.9%
5
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
6
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.9%
7
Toxins
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 20%
3.6%
9
Integrative Organismal Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
10
Integrative And Comparative Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
11
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
12
Insects
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
13
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
14
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
15
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
16
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
17
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
18
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
19
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
20
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.2%
21
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
22
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.0%
23
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.9%
24
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
General and Comparative Endocrinology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
27
Biomolecules
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
29
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
30
Animals
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%