Back

Image modifications reduce differences in natural-image encoding by retinal ganglion cells between natural and optogenetic stimulation

Ramakrishna, V.; Gollisch, T.

2026-03-09 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.03.06.710066 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Photoreceptor degeneration is among the leading causes of blindness and optogenetics as a potential therapeutic measure has garnered much attention over recent years. In this approach, light-sensitive molecules like Channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2) are inserted into neurons in the retina to play the role of light-sensing elements after the loss of photoreceptors. Previous studies have shown that retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in blind animal models with optogenetically modified retinas can respond reliably to steps in light intensity or similar diagnostic stimuli. Yet, little is known about how responses to natural stimuli in optogenetically treated retinas compare to normal, photoreceptor-mediated responses and how any differences might be counteracted by adjusting the stimulation. In this work, using mice of both sexes with intact photoreceptors as well as ChR2 expression in RGCs, we directly compared the encoding of natural images by individual RGCs under photoreceptor and optogenetic stimulation. We observed that evoked firing rates under optogenetic stimulation, relative to photoreceptor stimulation, often display reduced thresholding effects and a more linear dependence on receptive-field activation as well as reduced sensitivity to local spatial contrast and reduced dynamic range. Based on these differences, we devised modifications of the natural images, including thresholding and scaling of pixel intensities together with spatial low-pass filtering, and found that using such modified images under optogenetic stimulation can lead to stronger responses that are also more similar to the original photoreceptor-evoked responses. These findings may help optimize stimulation of optogenetically modified retinas to achieve more natural vision in future therapeutic applications. Significance StatementDegenerative diseases that lead to the loss of photoreceptors, the eyes light sensors in the retina, are a major cause of blindness. One promising therapy approach uses optogenetics to place light-sensitive proteins into retinal neurons, allowing them to detect light in the photoreceptors stead. We compared how the retina responds to natural images when stimulated via the inserted light-sensitive proteins versus normal activation and observed systematic differences in how images are represented, owing to reductions in response range, signal thresholding, and contrast sensitivity. Yet, by modifying the presented images, including spatial blurring as well as intensity thresholding and scaling, we managed to restore more natural image responses. These results suggest ways to improve visual quality from optogenetic treatments of blindness.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 2%
17.0%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.3%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 4%
8.2%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 12%
6.2%
5
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 36%
4.2%
7
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.5%
8
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 7%
3.0%
9
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.0%
10
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.3%
11
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.8%
12
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
79 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
13
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
14
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.6%
15
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.6%
16
Vision Research
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
17
Journal of Vision
92 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
18
Neurophotonics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
19
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
20
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
21
Translational Vision Science & Technology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
22
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
23
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.7%
24
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.7%
25
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%