Back

Strong Reward Signals, Weak Transfer: Limits of Spatial Priority Map Plasticity Across Task Contexts

Asko, O.; Stavrinou, M. L.; Hagen, T.; Espeseth, T.

2026-03-09 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.03.06.710060 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Reward learning can bias attentional selection, but whether spatially biased reinforcement produces durable, context-general changes in spatial priority over days, and what neurophysiological signals track such learning, remains uncertain. We combined electroencephalography (EEG) and pupillometry with a multi-session spatial reward-learning paradigm (Chelazzi et al., 2014) in which targets could appear at eight locations and reward probability was systematically biased across locations during two days of training. A separate baseline/test visual detection task was administered before training and again four days after training to assess delayed transfer under cross-target competition. Training produced strong reward signals across measures. Feedback-locked ERPs (FRN and P300) differentiated outcome valence and reward magnitude and varied systematically with time-on-task, while pupil dilation was larger following high- than low-reward feedback and overall task-evoked responses decreased across blocks. Reward history also modulated stimulus-locked target processing: targets at high- versus low-reward locations differed reliably across N1/N2 and a late positivity, indicating multi-stage value-dependent influences on visual processing during active learning. In contrast, transfer was weak in both behavior and ERPs: behavioral indices did not show a reliable advantage for highly rewarded locations at delayed test, and neural evidence for persistence was limited to an N2 modulation in the most diagnostic high-versus-low comparison, which should be interpreted cautiously given low trial counts. Accordingly, we did not replicate the robust long-term spatial priority effect reported in the original study. Together, these findings reveal strong reward-learning signals but weak cross-task transfer, suggesting limits on how readily spatial reward learning consolidates into persistent, task-general spatial priority-map plasticity across contexts.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
21.6%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 8%
17.5%
3
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.9%
4
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.7%
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 19%
3.8%
7
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.4%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.9%
9
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.6%
10
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.6%
11
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.5%
12
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 20%
2.3%
13
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
14
npj Science of Learning
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
15
Progress in Neurobiology
41 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
16
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.2%
17
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
18
Learning & Memory
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
19
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
Cerebral Cortex Communications
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
21
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
22
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.7%
23
Psychological Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
24
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
25
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%