Back

Carbon substrate type shapes spatial self-organization in a multi-species biofilm community

Zhu, D.; Svagan, A. J.; Kühl, M.; Burmolle, M.

2026-03-06 microbiology
10.64898/2026.03.06.709745 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Spatial organization is a defining feature of multispecies biofilms and critically influences microbial interactions and emergent community properties. However, understanding and manipulating how microbes assemble into spatially structured biofilms remains challenging because most experimental frameworks emphasize species composition and pairwise interactions, while often overlooking the spatial constraints on biofilms imposed by the environment. In this study, we focus on how carbon substrate type, distinguishing between diffusible sugars and polymeric substrates, affects biofilm self-organization in a four-member synthetic bacterial community (SynCom). Across all tested conditions, the SynCom consistently formed more biofilm biomass than any of its subsets, indicating a robust synergistic phenotype. Using chemically defined, 3D-printed hydrogel substrates with consistent physical properties, we varied carbon source composition to identify its impact on biofilm assembly. Microscopic imaging showed that carbon substrate type strongly influenced biofilm self-organization with diffusible simple carbon substrates yielding relatively intermixed communities, whereas polymer-rich carbon substrates promoted a highly structured biofilm organization characterized by the dominance and peripheral localization of polymer-degrading species. Bioinformatic analyses of carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes) annotation and genome-scale metabolic modeling suggested that metabolite exchange networks in the SynCom may drive more complex metabolic interactions beyond the commonly observed degrader-exploiter-scavenger relationship within planktonic microbial communities. Together, our findings demonstrate carbon substrate type as an important ecological determinant of biofilm self-organization, highlighting the need to integrate environmental factors alongside species composition and metabolic potential to fully understand and manipulate natural and engineered multispecies biofilms.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
56 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
44.4%
2
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.8%
50% of probability mass above
3
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.2%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.6%
5
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.8%
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 24%
2.9%
7
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.9%
8
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
9
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.8%
10
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.8%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 40%
1.8%
12
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
13
Microbial Biotechnology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
14
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
15
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.8%
17
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
18
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
19
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.8%
20
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
21
Biofilm
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
22
Gut Microbes
70 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.5%
24
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.5%
25
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%