Back

Effectiveness of health mediation to promote organized cancer screening among underserved and under-screened populations in Marseille, France: findings from a repeated cross-sectional survey

Legendre, E.; Dutrey-Kaiser, A.; Attalah, Y.; Boyer, G.; Nauleau, S.; Gaudart, J.; Kelly, D.; Caserio-Schönemann, C.; Malfait, P.; Chaud, P.; Ramalli, L.; Gastaldi, C.; Franke, F.; Rebaudet, S.

2026-03-06 public and global health
10.64898/2026.03.06.26347781 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAlthough health mediation is widely studied in the U.S. through community health worker programs, evidence on their effectiveness in promoting cancer screening in Europe is limited. Since 2022, the "13 en Sante" program has implemented a multicomponent health mediation intervention -- combining educational activities, outreach strategies, and navigation support -- in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighbourhoods of Marseille, France. This study evaluates the effectiveness of this program in promoting breast, colorectal, and cervical cancer screening. MethodsA controlled before-after design based on two cross-sectional surveys was conducted in 2022 and 2024 in intervention or control neighbourhoods. Individuals aged 18-74 were randomly selected and interviewed via door-to-door questionnaires. Weighting was applied to account for stratified sampling and to align age and sex distributions with census data. Weighted logistic regression models were fitted for each cancer screening to estimate the interventions effects on uptake and awareness at both individual and population levels. FindingsOverall, 4,523 individuals were included across the two cross-sectional surveys. The program successfully reached individuals facing cumulative socioeconomic barriers to healthcare access. No significant population-level effect was observed. At the individual level, declared exposure to health mediation was associated with significantly higher uptakes of breast and colorectal cancer screenings (breast: 54% vs. 74%, OR=2.3 [1.1-4.5]; colorectal: 30% vs. 50%, OR=2.8 [1.3-5.8]). In addition, colorectal cancer screening awareness was significantly higher among exposed participants (83% vs. 93%, OR=8.1 [2.1-31]). InterpretationThis study provides the first evidence that a multicomponent health mediation intervention could effectively promote breast and colorectal cancer screening in disadvantaged French neighbourhoods. The study highlights screening-specific mechanisms of action that should be considered to further optimize intervention effectiveness. FundingThe survey was funded by the Regional Health Agency of Provence-Alpes-Cote dAzur and Sante publique France.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.3%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.2%
4
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.8%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.8%
6
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
7
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.2%
8
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
9
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.8%
50% of probability mass above
10
International Journal of Public Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
11
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
12
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.4%
13
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
14
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
15
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
16
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
17
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
18
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
19
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.3%
20
Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
21
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
24
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
26
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
27
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
29
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
30
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%