Back

Utility of glucose, lipid and kidney function Trajectory Measures for incident Cardiovascular Disease risk prediction for people living with Type 2 Diabetes: a case-study using Danish registry data

Harms, P. P.; Silverman-Retana, O.; Schaarup, J.; Blom, M. T.; Isaksen, A. A.; Witte, D. R.

2026-03-06 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.03.06.26347493 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionCardiovascular disease (CVD) is an important complication of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Current incident CVD-prediction models use single baseline measurements and achieve moderate performance in people with T2D, with C-indices around 0.7. Modern healthcare registries contain repeated measurements of HbA1c, LDL-cholesterol and eGFR, which could carry incremental predictive value. However, the added value of trajectory measures for CVD-risk prediction remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the utility of HbA1c, LDL-cholesterol and eGFR trajectory measures for incident CVD-risk prediction in people with T2D. MethodsWe studied 83,326 people with T2D from Danish nation-wide registers, who were without a CVD-history at baseline (January 1st 2015), and had [≥]2 recorded HbA1c, LDL-cholesterol and eGFR measurements between 2012-2014. Their last measurement was considered as baseline. Across 2012-2014, three types of paired trajectory measures were calculated for each participant (mean & standard deviation (SD), median & interquartile range (IQR), and intercept & slope from a fitted growth model), for HbA1c, LDL-cholesterol, and eGFR, respectively. Reference Cox-regression models for CVD-events (ICD-10 codes assessed prospectively from 2015- 2020) included only baseline measurements (age, sex , age at T2D onset, HbA1c, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, eGFR, and medication use). Next, the paired trajectory measures were sequentially added to the reference model, computing Hazard Ratios, C-indices and Net reclassification index (NRI) with 95% confidence intervals. Lastly, a combined model was fitted. ResultsAt baseline, mean age was 65 (SD{+/-}12), median HbA1c was 48 (mmol/mol, IQR43-56), and 48% were female. During a median 6 years of follow-up 11,280 (14%) people had a CVD-event (ischemic heart disease: 40%; stroke: 32%; heart failure: 24%; CVD-mortality: 5%). Accounting for the reference model, trajectory measures of dispersion and change were associated with CVD-events, with hazard ratios {approx} 1.1 for HbA1c and eGFR, and >1.4 for LDL-cholesterol. Measures centrality did not show an association with CVD events. Addition of trajectory measures produced minimal gains in discrimination (C-index {Delta} +0.001-+0.003) but modest improvements in net reclassification (continuous NRI {approx} +3- +9%). ConclusionsTrajectory dispersion or change measures for HbA1c, eGFR and especially LDL-cholesterol, easily obtained from routine data, might moderately enhance incident CVD-risk prediction in people with T2D.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Diabetologia
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.8%
2
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.6%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 21%
5.1%
4
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
5
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
6
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.2%
8
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
9
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.2%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.0%
11
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
12
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
13
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
14
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
15
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
16
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.3%
17
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
18
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
19
Epidemiology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
20
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
22
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
23
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
24
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Diabetes
53 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
26
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
15 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
27
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
28
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
29
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
30
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%