Back

Postnatal Development of the Gray Short Tailed Opossum (Monodelphis domestica): Implications for Metatherian Decline at the K/Pg Boundary

Couzens, A. M. C.; Lau, C. L. F.; Sears, K. E.

2026-03-08 developmental biology
10.64898/2026.03.05.709990 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Marsupials give birth to extremely altricial offspring which must be reared externally for an extended period, often in a pouch. Despite often being considered a defining feature of marsupials, around a third of living species lack a pouch. Here, we describe the postnatal development of the gray short-tailed opossum, Monodelphis domestica, a small pouchless South American didelphid and consider its implications for life history evolution within Metatheria. We find that at birth, ossification and chondrogenesis in neonatal M. domestica is more extensive than in basal pouched Australidelphian marsupials like the dunnart. Key precocial milestones such as tarsal ossification, eye opening, growth of body fur, and chewing tooth eruption occur earlier and more rapidly. Principal component analysis of life history and reproductive traits reveals a pronounced r- to K-selected gradient across living marsupial species. Stochastic character-mapping based ancestral state reconstruction suggests that absence of the pouch, and by inference possession of an r-selected life history strategy characterised by large litters, short attachment phases, and accelerated weaning was likely ancestral amongst crown-group marsupials. The more K-selected reproductive strategy of pouched marsupials wherein there is a prolonged postnatal development window, and relative few young are produced, likely evolved during the early Cenozoic, and separately amongst australidelphian and ameridelphian marsupials. Rather than making early marsupials more sensitive to environmental disturbances, we hypothesis that their possession of an r-selected life history strategy may have been a key factor in their persistence through the K-Pg extinction.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
26.3%
2
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 1%
10.3%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.9%
4
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 12%
6.5%
6
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.9%
7
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.7%
8
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 18%
2.8%
9
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.6%
10
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.9%
11
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
12
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.5%
14
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
15
Cerebral Cortex Communications
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
16
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
17
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
19
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
20
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.8%
21
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.7%
22
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
24
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
26
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.7%
27
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
29
EvoDevo
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.5%