Back

Rapid Orthographic and Delayed Phonological Processing: ERP and Oscillatory Evidence from Masked Priming in Korean

Kim, J.; Lee, S.; Nam, K.

2026-03-06 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.03.05.709970 bioRxiv
Show abstract

A central question in visual word recognition concerns whether orthographic and phonological codes are coordinated sequentially or in parallel during lexical access. Korean Hangul, an alpha-syllabic writing system with morphophonemic spelling principles, allows independent manipulation of orthographic and phonological syllable overlap within a single experimental design. In a masked priming lexical decision task with EEG, we contrasted orthographically identical primes (e.g., -), phonologically overlapping primes (e.g., -), and unrelated primes. Event-related potentials and time-frequency representations (theta: 4-8 Hz, lower beta: 13-20 Hz, upper beta: 20-30 Hz) were analyzed to capture both evoked and oscillatory neural dynamics. Orthographic priming produced a cascade of facilitative effects: early fronto-central P200 enhancement (150-250 ms) with upper beta synchronization (30-290 ms), followed by centro-parietal N400 reduction (350-550 ms) with frontal theta suppression (400-730 ms), and behavioral facilitation. Phonological priming, by contrast, elicited sustained lower beta activity over central regions (310-590 ms) but produced no early electrophysiological modulation and no behavioral facilitation. This spatiotemporal dissociation provides converging neural evidence that orthographic syllable processing emerges at pre-lexical stages and cascades into lexical-level processing, whereas phonological syllable effects are confined to later stages of lexical access. These findings provide support for a sequential or cascaded account of orthographic-phonological coordination, as predicted by dual-route models, while challenging strong forms of parallel activation, and suggest that the alpha-syllabic structure of Korean may enable a processing strategy in which orthographic parsing serves as an efficient entry route to the lexicon.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 19%
9.9%
2
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 7%
9.0%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.3%
4
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.3%
5
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.3%
6
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
8
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.2%
9
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
10
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
11
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
12
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.3%
13
Progress in Neurobiology
41 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
14
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.0%
15
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.9%
16
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
17
Brain and Language
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
18
Cerebral Cortex Communications
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
19
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.6%
20
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
21
Psychophysiology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
22
Neurobiology of Language
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
23
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
24
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.9%
25
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.9%
26
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.9%
27
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
28
Cognition
44 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
29
Developmental Science
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
30
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%