Back

Invasion histories reveal most North American introduced plants have not yet reached climatic stasis.

Roach-Krajewski, M.; Smith, T. W.; Kharouba, H. M.

2026-03-07 ecology
10.64898/2026.03.05.709936 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AimAnalysis of species distributions often rests on the assumption of environmental equilibrium. That is, the distribution of a species (as documented by observation records) captures the full range of environmental conditions under which that species can maintain viable populations. Despite the centrality of this assumption to a variety of biogeographic questions, it is rarely empirically tested. This is particularly critical for recently introduced invasive species that are characterized by rapid expansion in their introduced range, often coupled with a niche shift relative to their native distribution. Defining equilibrium under these dynamic conditions is difficult. We developed the concept of environmental stasis as a more tractable proxy for equilibrium. In the context of species invasions, we define stasis as a prolonged period without an increase in the environmental conditions occupied by a species. LocationNorth America Time Period1614 to 2020. Major Taxa StudiedInvasive plants MethodsWe applied the metric of climatic stasis to a suite of 258 invasive plant species in North America. We categorized their invasion trajectories into three classes (linear, two- and three-phase) based on theoretical expectations and then assessed how many had demonstrated environmental (climatic) stasis over a period of at least thirty years. ResultsMore than 80% of the species were best fit by two- or three-phase models, indicating a declining rate of expansion. Climatic stasis was only documented for 44% of the species. In contrast, 85% of the species were in climatic stasis in their native ranges. The time to reach stasis ranged from 30 to 145 years (mean 90), and species at stasis in their invaded range occupied 97% of the climatic space they occupied in their native range. Main ConclusionsThis assessment provides valuable insight into the unrealized threat posed by the majority of invasive plants that have not yet reached stasis, as well as identifying which species can be most appropriately evaluated by methods that depend on the equilibrium assumption. Our work also demonstrates the useful perspective provided by the environmental stasis concept, which enables empirical quantification of one of the key aspects of equilibrium.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.9%
2
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
3
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.2%
4
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.7%
5
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.7%
6
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
8
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
9
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.5%
10
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.2%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
12
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
13
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
14
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.0%
15
Journal of Biogeography
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
16
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 40%
1.7%
18
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
19
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.6%
20
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
21
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.4%
22
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
23
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.3%
24
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
25
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
26
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
27
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
28
Applications in Plant Sciences
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
29
Ecological Entomology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
30
Oecologia
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%