Back

Mapping and Genetic Dissection of a Novel Tar Spot Resistance QTL on Maize Chromosome 1

Singh, R.; Crane, C. F.; Mekonen, T.; Shim, S.; Telenko, D. E. P.; Goodwin, S. B.

2026-03-06 plant biology
10.64898/2026.03.05.709888 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Tar spot, caused by the obligate fungus Phyllachora maydis, significantly threatens maize (Zea mays L.) production across the Americas. Host genetic resistance offers the most viable long-term management strategy. Building on observed differential tar spot tolerance in parents B73 and Mo17, we utilized a strategic core subset of 94 intermated B73 x Mo17 (IBM-94) population to characterize the genetic architecture of resistance. Phenotypic analysis of a panel of 96 recombinant inbreds including the susceptible parent, Mo17, and the moderately resistant parent, B73 confirmed stable differences in susceptibility, with B73 consistently demonstrating moderate resistance compared to Mo17. Analysis of variance revealed highly significant genetic variation within the population (F = 12.96; p < 0.001). High Pearson correlation (r = 0.8706, p < 0.0001) and coefficient of determination (R2 = 0.7579) across environments indicated that 76% of the phenotypic variance is attributable to genetic factors. Linkage mapping identified a novel, consistent major QTL cluster on chromosome 1. This cluster comprises five regions (qTAR_1.1 through qTAR_1.5) exceeding the significance threshold (LOD 3.8) in both years. We identified 74 candidate genes including bZIP, and RING/U-box proteins at significant SNP peaks. Additionally, gene annotation revealed a high concentration of wall-associated kinases and S-locus lectin protein kinases within the qTAR_1.4 and qTAR_1.5 regions, alongside potential defense-related transcription factors (MYB, bZIP, and C2H2 zinc fingers).These findings provide a framework for high-resolution mapping and functional validation to accelerate the development of tar spot-resistant maize cultivars.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.2%
2
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
10.0%
3
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
4
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.8%
5
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.8%
6
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
8
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
10
Plant Communications
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.8%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.4%
12
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
13
The Plant Genome
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
14
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 28%
2.0%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.9%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 44%
1.6%
18
Phytopathology®
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
19
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
20
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
21
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
55 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
Nature Plants
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%