Back

A novel event improves memory retrieval and divergent thinking in a naturalistic school environment

Ramirez Butavand, D.; Barbuzza, A.; Bekinschtein, P.; Ballarini, F.

2026-03-09 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.03.05.709820 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Stored memories are useless unless they are available for retrieval. Thus, investigating different ways to modulate retrieval is crucial. Novelty has been extensively studied as a modulator of memory. In this study, we investigated whether exposure to a novel event, an innovative neuroscience lesson, can enhance memory retrieval and divergent thinking in high school students. Across three experiments, we assessed the timing and mechanisms underlying these effects. In experiment 1, we found that memory retrieval was enhanced when the novel lesson occurred immediately before a memory test, but not when it was presented one hour earlier. In experiment 2, we found that the same immediate novelty exposure improved divergent thinking performance. Finally, in experiment 3, we explored potential shared mechanisms using a competition protocol and revealed that novelty improved divergent thinking regardless of its timing relative to memory retrieval. However, memory retrieval benefited only when tested immediately before the divergent thinking task. These results suggest that novelty boosts both memory retrieval and divergent thinking, but through partially distinct mechanisms. Our findings demonstrate that a simple, real-world classroom intervention can effectively enhance key cognitive functions in students. Significance StatementStored memories are only valuable if they can be retrieved, and memory retrieval plays a key role in creative thinking. Here, we tested whether a simple, novel event, a neuroscience lesson, could enhance memory retrieval and creative thinking in a real-world classroom setting. We found that novelty improved both memory retrieval and divergent thinking, an aspect of creative thinking, when presented immediately before the task. Finally, we revealed a non-reciprocal competition effect between memory retrieval and divergent thinking. These findings highlight a practical, low-cost intervention to boost key cognitive functions in students, demonstrating that brief, well-timed novel experiences can support both learning and creative thinking in educational environments.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 6%
10.3%
2
npj Science of Learning
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
3
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
4
Learning & Memory
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
Cognition
44 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
6
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 24%
3.6%
8
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
9
Consciousness and Cognition
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
10
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 27%
2.1%
13
Psychological Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
14
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
15
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.9%
16
Developmental Science
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
17
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
81 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
18
Hippocampus
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
19
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
20
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
21
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.4%
22
Psychophysiology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
23
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
24
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.0%
25
Psychological Review
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
26
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
27
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
28
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
29
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
30
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%