Back

From Head to Toe: Efficient Somatosensory Mapping with Fast Stimulation and Multivariate Pattern Analysis

Fuchs, X.; Schubert, J.; Heed, T.

2026-03-07 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.03.05.709759 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSomatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) measured with electroencephalography (EEG) are widely used to study cortical responses to touch but most research has limited the focus on few body parts, typically a finger, and applied time-consuming testing protocols. Multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) provides a complementary approach that may increase sensitivity and allow faster stimulation, yet its relationship to classical SEP analysis in somatosensory research remains largely unexplored. MethodsFifteen participants received vibrotactile stimulation on the finger, hand, cheek, and foot while EEG was recorded. We compared a traditional "slow" stimulation protocol (800-1200 ms inter-stimulus intervals) with a "fast" protocol (300-500 ms). We compared temporal and topographical aspects between SEP and MVPA. ResultsBoth stimulation protocols produced highly similar SEP components (P100, N140, P200), topographies, and classification results, while the fast protocol reduced testing time by about 60%. SEPs revealed systematic body-part differences, with earlier components for cheek stimulation and delayed responses for the foot. Multivariate classification distinguished body parts with accuracies up to [~]50-55% (chance: 25%), peaking around 100 ms after stimulus onset. Classifier weight maps closely matched SEP topographies over centroparietal electrodes, indicating that classification relied on physiologically meaningful somatosensory signals. Classification accuracy peaked around 100 ms after stimulus onset, coinciding with the SEP P100 component, but declined gradually thereafter, suggesting that early somatosensory responses contain particularly informative multivariate patterns that generalize over time. ConclusionsFaster stimulation protocols substantially increase efficiency without compromising interpretability. Combining classical SEP analysis with multivariate classification provides complementary insights and offers a powerful framework for mapping somatosensory representations across the body.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 1%
17.0%
2
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.0%
3
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.2%
4
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.1%
5
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.7%
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 7%
4.7%
8
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.7%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.5%
10
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
11
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
12
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
13
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
14
Clinical Neurophysiology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
15
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.6%
16
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.6%
17
Ear & Hearing
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
18
Journal of Visualized Experiments
30 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
19
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
21
Muscle & Nerve
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
22
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.7%
23
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.6%
25
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.6%