Back

Defining mutational signatures of lung cancer-associated carcinogens through in vitro exposure of human airway epithelial cells

Gurevich, N. Q.; Chiu, D. J.; Yajima, M.; Huggins, J.; Mazzilli, S. A.; Campbell, J. D.

2026-03-09 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.03.05.707509 bioRxiv
Show abstract

While distinct environmental exposures imprint unique mutational signatures on cancer genomes, the specific causal patterns for many known carcinogens remain uncharacterized in relevant human tissues. To address this gap, we developed a novel, physiologically relevant system that uses a combination of airway epithelial cells and whole genome sequencing to characterize mutational patterns induced by genotoxic carcinogens associated with lung cancer. After validating the platforms accuracy by successfully recapturing the known signature for Benzo(a)pyrene (BaP), we used this system to gain detailed insights into the types of mutations that occur with exposure to N-nitrosotris-(2-chloroethyl) urea (NTCU) and 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK), genotoxic compounds that induce lung squamous cell carcinoma and lung adenocarcinoma in mouse models, respectively. Cells exposed to NTCU had significantly more somatic SNVs compared to control samples. An average of 82.3% of mutations in NTCU samples were attributed to a novel mutational signature distinct from those in the COSMIC database but highly correlated with recent in vivo mouse models. In contrast, NNK exposure did not demonstrate a distinct mutational pattern above background at both high and low concentrations. Ultimately, this in vitro system provides a robust platform to define causal links between environmental exposures and mutational patterns in lung cancer mutagenesis. Statement of SignificanceIn vitro exposure of N-nitrosotris-(2-chloroethyl) urea to airway epithelial cells revealed a distinct mutational signature.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Toxicological Sciences
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.9%
2
Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 6%
10.2%
4
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.5%
5
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.9%
8
Environmental Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
9
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.9%
11
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
12
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
Journal of Hazardous Materials
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
15
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
Archives of Toxicology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
17
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.0%
19
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.8%
22
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
24
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
25
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.7%
26
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.5%
27
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.5%
28
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
29
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.5%