Back

Performance of a Semi-Automated Hierarchical Rest Interval Detection Pipeline (actiSleep) for Wrist Actigraphy in Adolescents

Soehner, A. M.; Kissel, N.; Hasler, B. P.; Franzen, P. L.; Levenson, J. C.; Clark, D. B.; Buysse, D. J.; Wallace, M. L.

2026-03-06 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.03.05.26347744 medRxiv
Show abstract

Actigraphy is a popular behavioral sleep assessment tool in research and clinical practice. Hierarchical hand-scoring approaches remain the standard for actigraphy rest interval estimation, but can be impractical for large cohort studies and suffer from reproducibility problems. We developed a semi-automated pipeline (actiSleep) to set rest intervals consistent with best-practice hand-scoring algorithms incorporating event marker, diary, light, and activity data. To evaluate actiSleep performance, we used data from an observational study of 51 adolescents (14-19yr), with and without family history of bipolar disorder. Participants completed 2 weeks of wrist actigraphy and daily sleep diary. We first hand-scored records using a standardized hierarchical algorithm incorporating event marker, diary, light, and activity data. We then compared the hand-scored rest intervals to those from actiSleep and two automated activity-based algorithms ( Activity-Merged, Activity-Only). Activity-Only used activity-based sleep estimation and Activity-Merged joined closely adjacent rest intervals. For rest onset, rest offset, and rest duration, all algorithms had strong mean agreement with hand-scoring: actiSleep estimates were within 1-3 minutes, Activity-Merged within 2-4 minutes, and Activity-Only within 7-14 minutes. However, actiSleep had notably better (narrower) margins of agreement with hand-scoring, as evidenced by Bland-Altman plots, and greater positive predictive value and true positive rates for rest detection, especially in the 60 minutes surrounding the onset and offset of the rest interval. The actiSleep algorithm successfully estimates actigraphy rest intervals comparable to hand-scoring while avoiding pitfalls of activity-only algorithms. actiSleep has potential to replace hand-scoring for research in adolescents but requires further testing and validation in other samples.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.1%
2
Sleep
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 12%
7.1%
4
Journal of Biological Rhythms
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.3%
6
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.2%
7
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.9%
9
Journal of Sleep Research
31 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
10
Sleep Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
11
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
12
SLEEP
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
13
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 43%
1.7%
15
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
16
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
17
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
20
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
21
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.6%
22
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%