Back

Stability of Microbiome-Derived Fatty Acids in Self-Collected Samples: A Comparative Evaluation of Stool and Blood Matrices

Marsiglia, M. D.; Dei Cas, M.; Bianchi, S.; Borghi, E.

2026-03-06 gastroenterology
10.64898/2026.03.05.26347712 medRxiv
Show abstract

AbstractO_ST_ABSBackgroundC_ST_ABSShort-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) are widely used as functional readouts of gut microbial activity in vivo. The growing adoption of decentralised study designs and self-collection protocols has amplified the need for reliable room-temperature storage and shipment strategies. However, SCFAs volatility and the persistence of post-collection microbial metabolism raise concerns regarding pre-analytical stability and the interpretability of measured concentrations. MethodsWe assessed the temporal stability of fatty acids (FAs) across intestinal and systemic matrices under room-temperature storage. Untreated stool was compared with two nucleic acid stabilisation devices (eNAT and OMNIgene-GUT), while whole blood, plasma and dried blood spots (DBS) were evaluated as minimally invasive systemic sampling strategies. Profiles were quantified using complementary GC-MS and LC-MS/MS workflows. ResultsUntreated stool showed fermentation-driven increases in major SCFAs, whereas immediate freezing preserved baseline profiles. eNAT maintained faecal FA stability for up to 21 days, while OMNIgene-GUT exhibited baseline and time-dependent alterations. In systemic matrices, plasma and whole blood showed upward drift, whereas DBS declined initially before stabilising after approximately 14 days. ConclusionsFA measurements are highly matrix- and device-dependent. Our findings provide practical guidance for the selection of sampling strategies in microbiome-associated FA studies and emphasise the need for controlled pre-analytical conditions in decentralised microbiome studies.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.